117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33599796)
1. Invited Discussion on: Four-year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round Silk Surface: A Multi-center, Retrospective Study.
Ribeiro RC; de Córdova LF; Novaes W; Arduini AB
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(3):904-906. PubMed ID: 33599796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
Hong P; Kim SS; Jeong C; Hwang SH; Kim TS; Park JH; Song YG; Song YK
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(3):895-903. PubMed ID: 33649929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix
Liu Y; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(Suppl 1):209-210. PubMed ID: 34240237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A non-manufacturer-sponsored, retrospective study to assess 2-year safety outcomes of the BellaGel® SmoothFine as compared with its competitors in the context of the first Korean case of a medical device fraud.
Nam SE; Lee S; Cho Y; Kim JH
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0259825. PubMed ID: 36730227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term treatment outcomes and safety of two representative brands of the fifth-generation silicone gel-filled breast implants in Korea.
Moon DS; Choi WS; Kim HC; Jeong JP; Sung JY; Kim JH
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2021 Dec; 55(6):345-353. PubMed ID: 33660572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comments on "Preliminary 3-Year Evaluation of Experience With SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva Silicone Breast Implants: A Single-Center Experience With 5813 Consecutive Breast Augmentation Cases".
Duscher D; Aitzetmüller MM; Wenny R; Huemer GM
Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jan; 39(2):NP18-NP19. PubMed ID: 30517590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to "Comments on 'Preliminary 3-Year Evaluation of Experience With SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva Silicone Breast Implants: A Single-Center Experience With 5813 Consecutive Breast Augmentation Cases'".
Sforza M
Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jan; 39(2):NP20-NP22. PubMed ID: 30517604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants: Outcome Analysis of 100 Primary Breast Augmentations over 3 Years and Technical Considerations.
Huemer GM; Wenny R; Aitzetmüller MM; Duscher D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jun; 141(6):831e-842e. PubMed ID: 29794696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discussion: Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants: Outcome Analysis of 100 Primary Breast Augmentations over 3 Years and Technical Considerations.
Disa JJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jun; 141(6):843e-844e. PubMed ID: 29794697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reply: Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants: The Tale of Goldilocks: Never Be Afraid of Exploring Unknown Territory.
Huemer GM; Wenny R; Aitzetmüller MM; Duscher D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):240e-241e. PubMed ID: 30418313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of SERI™ Surgical Scaffolds in direct-to-implant reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy: A retrospective study on surgical outcomes and a systematic review of current literature.
van Turnhout AAWM; Franke CJJ; Vriens-Nieuwenhuis EJC; van der Sluis WB
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 May; 71(5):644-650. PubMed ID: 29398609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discussion: Comparing Round and Anatomically Shaped Implants in Augmentation Mammaplasty: The Experts' Ability to Differentiate the Type of Implant.
Lista F
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jan; 139(1):65-66. PubMed ID: 28027229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High-Resolution Ultrasound-Assisted Assessment of Preliminary Short-term Safety Outcomes of an Implant-Based Augmentation Mammaplasty Using a Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth-Surface Device in Korean Females.
Lee S; Jeong JP; Sung JY; Choi WS; Moon DS; Kim HC; Kim JH
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2022; 4():ojab046. PubMed ID: 35072069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invited Discussion on: "Breast Auto-augmentation (Mastopexy and Lipofilling): An Option for Quitting Breast Implants".
Brown M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(5):1142-1144. PubMed ID: 31289881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Discussion: Intraoperative Comparison of Anatomical versus Round Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mallucci P
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Mar; 139(3):599-600. PubMed ID: 28234828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Discussion: Intraoperative Comparison of Anatomical versus Round Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ahmad J; Lista F
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Mar; 139(3):597-598. PubMed ID: 28234827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The pythagorean theorem as a tool for preoperative planning of a concealed scar in augmentation mammaplasty with round implants.
Bouwer LR; Tielemans HJP; van der Lei B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):110-112. PubMed ID: 25539300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invited Discussion On: Muscle-Splitting Breast Augmentation.
Sozer O; Phillips P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Dec; 43(6):1478-1479. PubMed ID: 31506782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing Round and Anatomically Shaped Implants in Augmentation Mammaplasty: The Experts' Ability to Differentiate the Type of Implant.
Vera Cucchiaro J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Nov; 140(5):758e. PubMed ID: 29068961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
