These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33599875)

  • 1. Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Schmidmaier R; Braun LT
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Aug; 26(3):847-863. PubMed ID: 33599875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.
    Kunzelmann AK; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    MDM Policy Pract; 2022; 7(1):23814683221086623. PubMed ID: 35321028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualizing the Bayesian 2-test case: The effect of tree diagrams on medical decision making.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Bruckmaier G; Marienhagen J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0195029. PubMed ID: 29584770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian versus diagnostic information in physician-patient communication: Effects of direction of statistical information and presentation of visualization.
    Brose SF; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0283947. PubMed ID: 37285320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Boosting for insight and/or boosting for agency? How to maximize accurate test interpretation with natural frequencies.
    Feufel MA; Keller N; Kendel F; Spies CD
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Feb; 23(1):75. PubMed ID: 36747214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances.
    Pighin S; Girotto V; Tentori K
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():164-175. PubMed ID: 28692831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Navarrete G; Juanchich M
    Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105722. PubMed ID: 38309041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Another chance for good reasoning.
    Pighin S; Tentori K; Girotto V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 28265865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Teaching Bayesian reasoning: an evaluation of a classroom tutorial for medical students.
    Kurzenhäuser S; Hoffrage U
    Med Teach; 2002 Sep; 24(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 12450472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [How can one improve the understanding and communication of the importance of medical test results?].
    Hoffrage U; Kurzenhäuser S; Gigerenzer G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):713-9. PubMed ID: 11127778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.
    Weber P; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1833. PubMed ID: 30369891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
    Cohen AL; Sidlowski S; Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):972-978. PubMed ID: 27604495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures of Bayesian Reasoning Performance on 'Normal' and 'Natural' Frequency Tasks.
    Stock R; Fisk JE; Montgomery C
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(3):185-214. PubMed ID: 27410053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A New Visualization for Probabilistic Situations Containing Two Binary Events: The Frequency Net.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Wiesner P
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():750. PubMed ID: 32528335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks.
    Hoffrage U; Krauss S; Martignon L; Gigerenzer G
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1473. PubMed ID: 26528197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How general is the natural frequency effect? The case of joint probabilities.
    Stegmüller N; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1296359. PubMed ID: 38659687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician and Nonphysician Estimates of Positive Predictive Value in Diagnostic v. Mass Screening Mammography: An Examination of Bayesian Reasoning.
    Austin LC
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Feb; 39(2):108-118. PubMed ID: 30678607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of visualizing statistical information - an empirical study on tree diagrams and 2 × 2 tables.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Bruckmaier G
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1186. PubMed ID: 26379569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Eye-Tracking Study of Statistical Reasoning With Tree Diagrams and 2 × 2 Tables.
    Bruckmaier G; Binder K; Krauss S; Kufner HM
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():632. PubMed ID: 31156488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural mapping in statistical word problems: A relational reasoning approach to Bayesian inference.
    Johnson ED; Tubau E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):964-971. PubMed ID: 27678378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.