These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33600065)

  • 1. For better or for worse family-related well-being: A meta-analysis of crossover effects in dyadic studies.
    Matei A; Maricuțoiu LP; Vîrgă D
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2021 May; 13(2):357-376. PubMed ID: 33600065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The spillover and crossover of resources among partners: the role of work-self and family-self facilitation.
    Demerouti E
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2012 Apr; 17(2):184-195. PubMed ID: 22308969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How job and family demands impact change in perceived stress: A dyadic study.
    Smoktunowicz E; Cieślak R
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 31(2):199-215. PubMed ID: 28991270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Domain Satisfaction and Overall Life Satisfaction: Testing the Spillover-Crossover Model in Chilean Dual-Earner Couples.
    Schnettler B; Miranda-Zapata E; Orellana L; Poblete H; Lobos G; Lapo M; Adasme-Berríos C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33080810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Work-family enrichment, work-family conflict, and marital satisfaction: a dyadic analysis.
    van Steenbergen EF; Kluwer ES; Karney BR
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2014 Apr; 19(2):182-94. PubMed ID: 24730427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossover of Resources and Well-Being within Employee-Partner Dyads: Through Increased Schedule Control.
    Lee S; Lawson KM; Damaske S
    Community Work Fam; 2019; 22(4):391-411. PubMed ID: 32982568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of job and family demands on partner's fatigue: A study of Japanese dual-earner parents.
    Watanabe M; Shimazu A; Bakker AB; Demerouti E; Shimada K; Kawakami N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172291. PubMed ID: 28235008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female informant-reports of male romantic partners' alcohol problems predict escalations in dyadic conflict in heterosexual couples.
    Farrelly KN; Sherry SB; Kehayes IL; Stewart SH
    Addict Behav; 2019 May; 92():102-107. PubMed ID: 30599382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Work-to-relationship conflict: crossover effects in dual-earner couples.
    Matthews RA; Del Priore RE; Acitelli LK; Barnes-Farrell JL
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2006 Jul; 11(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 16834471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It takes two: a longitudinal dyadic study on predictors of fertility outcomes.
    Hutteman R; Bleidorn W; Penke L; Denissen JJ
    J Pers; 2013 Oct; 81(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 22925070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual and Partner Correlates of Sexual Satisfaction and Relationship Happiness in Midlife Couples: Dyadic Analysis of the International Survey of Relationships.
    Fisher WA; Donahue KL; Long JS; Heiman JR; Rosen RC; Sand MS
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1609-20. PubMed ID: 25370356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptions of partners' problematic alcohol use affect relationship outcomes beyond partner self-reported drinking: alcohol use in committed romantic relationships.
    Rodriguez LM; Øverup CS; Neighbors C
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Sep; 27(3):627-38. PubMed ID: 23438240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dyadic concordance and associations of beliefs with intentions to learn carrier results from genomic sequencing.
    Huelsnitz CO; Turbitt E; Taber JM; Lewis KL; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB; Klein WMP
    J Behav Med; 2021 Dec; 44(6):860-866. PubMed ID: 33987754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing a resource-based spillover-crossover-spillover model: Transmission of social support in dual-earner couples.
    Booth-LeDoux SM; Matthews RA; Wayne JH
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Jul; 105(7):732-747. PubMed ID: 31697116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Crossover Study From a Gender Perspective: The Relationship Between Job Insecurity, Job Satisfaction, and Partners' Family Life Satisfaction.
    Emanuel F; Molino M; Presti AL; Spagnoli P; Ghislieri C
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1481. PubMed ID: 30158890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Couples' daily self-regulation: The Health Action Process Approach at the dyadic level.
    Berli C; Lüscher J; Luszczynska A; Schwarzer R; Scholz U
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205887. PubMed ID: 30372470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do people really know their sex partners? Concurrency, knowledge of partner behavior, and sexually transmitted infections within partnerships.
    Drumright LN; Gorbach PM; Holmes KK
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Jul; 31(7):437-42. PubMed ID: 15215701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of perceived social support on quality of life in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting and their partners: testing dyadic dynamics using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.
    Thomson P; Molloy GJ; Chung ML
    Psychol Health Med; 2012; 17(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 21678197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye of the beholder: the individual and dyadic contributions of empathic accuracy and perceived empathic effort to relationship satisfaction.
    Cohen S; Schulz MS; Weiss E; Waldinger RJ
    J Fam Psychol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):236-45. PubMed ID: 22369462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How job demands affect partners' experience of exhaustion: integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory.
    Bakker AB; Demerouti E; Dollard MF
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jul; 93(4):901-11. PubMed ID: 18642992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.