These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33600203)

  • 21. Use of vocalic cues to consonant voicing and native language background: the influence of experimental design.
    Crowther CS; Mann V
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):513-25. PubMed ID: 8008553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. French-speaking children's understanding of sarcasm: the role of intonation and context.
    Laval V; Bert-Erboul A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):610-20. PubMed ID: 16197276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lexical support for phonetic perception during nonnative spoken word recognition.
    Samuel AG; Frost R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1746-52. PubMed ID: 26866066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cortical encoding and neurophysiological tracking of intensity and pitch cues signaling English stress patterns in native and nonnative speakers.
    Chung WL; Bidelman GM
    Brain Lang; 2016; 155-156():49-57. PubMed ID: 27140864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech segmentation by native and non-native speakers: the use of lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues.
    Sanders LD; Neville HJ; Woldorff MG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):519-30. PubMed ID: 12069004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Role of Voice Quality in Mandarin Sarcastic Speech: An Acoustic and Electroglottographic Study.
    Li S; Gu W; Liu L; Tang P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 32762594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English.
    Flege JE; Hillenbrand J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):508-17. PubMed ID: 3950204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Crossmodal and incremental perception of audiovisual cues to emotional speech.
    Barkhuysen P; Krahmer E; Swerts M
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 1):3-30. PubMed ID: 20415000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developing Appreciation for Sarcasm and Sarcastic Gossip: It Depends on Perspective.
    Glenwright M; Tapley B; Rano JKS; Pexman PM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3295-3309. PubMed ID: 29098274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Proficiency in English sentence stress production by Cantonese speakers who speak English as a second language (ESL).
    Ng ML; Chen Y
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 21793782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intonation influences how children and adults interpret sarcasm.
    Glenwright M; Parackel JM; Cheung KR; Nilsen ES
    J Child Lang; 2014 Mar; 41(2):472-84. PubMed ID: 23534818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of English.
    Ylinen S; Uther M; Latvala A; Vepsäläinen S; Iverson P; Akahane-Yamada R; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1319-32. PubMed ID: 19445609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
    Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sarcasm use in Turkish: The roles of personality, age, gender, and self-esteem.
    Banasik-Jemielniak N; Kałowski P; Akkaya B; Siemieniuk A; Abayhan Y; Kandemirci-Bayız D; Dryll E; Branowska K; Olechowska A; Glenwright M; Zajączkowska M; Rowicka M; Pexman PM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0276073. PubMed ID: 36355694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Insincere utterances and gaze: eye contact during sarcastic statements.
    Williams JA; Burns EL; Harmon EA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Apr; 108(2):565-72. PubMed ID: 19544962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. No, No One Had Fun. Individual Differences in Nonliteral Language Perception.
    Joergensen GH; Makarla PR; Fammartino M; Benson L; Rothermich K
    Lang Speech; 2022 Jun; 65(2):290-310. PubMed ID: 34148389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is there adaptation of speech production after speech perception in bilingual interaction?
    Broos WPJ; Dijkgraaf A; Van Assche E; Vander Beken H; Dirix N; Lagrou E; Hartsuiker RJ; Duyck W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1252-1270. PubMed ID: 30265054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.