These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33602541)

  • 1. Percentage of mesh reduction appropriate for designing digital obturator prostheses on personal computers.
    Farook TH; Abdullah JY; Jamayet NB; Alam MK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 33602541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generation and evaluation of 3D digital casts of maxillary defects based on multisource data registration: A pilot clinical study.
    Ye H; Ma Q; Hou Y; Li M; Zhou Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):790-795. PubMed ID: 28449864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of Prosthodontic Computer-Aided Designed Models: A Virtual Evaluation of Mesh Quality Reduction Using Open Source Software.
    Farook TH; Barman A; Abdullah JY; Jamayet NB
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Jun; 30(5):420-429. PubMed ID: 33200429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Designing 3D prosthetic templates for maxillofacial defect rehabilitation: A comparative analysis of different virtual workflows.
    Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Asif JA; Rajion ZA; Alam MK
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Mar; 118():103646. PubMed ID: 32174323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Triangular mesh reduction of digitized maxillectomy defects for prosthetic rehabilitation: A 3D deviation study.
    Elbashti ME; Aswehlee A; Rahman MA; Sumita YI; Bornstein MM; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Molinero-Mourelle P
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104090. PubMed ID: 35276319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of triangular mesh resolution on the geometrical trueness of segmented CBCT maxillofacial data into STL format.
    Elbashti M; Molinero-Mourelle P; Aswehlee A; Bornstein MM; Abou-Ayash S; Schimmel M; Ella B; Naveau A
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104722. PubMed ID: 37742810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interproximal distance analysis of stereolithographic casts made by CAD-CAM technology: An in vitro study.
    Hoffman M; Cho SH; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):624-630. PubMed ID: 28477918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
    Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of intraoral scanning and conventional processing to fabricate a definitive obturator: A dental technique.
    Alqarni H; Kattadiyil MT; Aponte-Wesson R; Alfaifi M; Alsayed H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):596-599. PubMed ID: 32988612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PEEK Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis Fabrication Using Intraoral Scanning, 3D Printing, and CAD/CAM.
    Tasopoulos T; Chatziemmanouil D; Kouveliotis G; Karaiskou G; Wang J; Zoidis P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(3):333-340. PubMed ID: 32320188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
    Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of digital and conventional methods of fit evaluation of partial removable dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting.
    Alabdullah SA; Hannam AG; Wyatt CC; McCullagh APG; Aleksejuniene J; Mostafa NZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):478.e1-478.e10. PubMed ID: 35221036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.