These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33604012)
21. The relative importance of factors influencing the surgeons' choice between mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery for women with breast cancer. Koksalmis GH; Cetinguc B; Durucu M; Camgoz Akdag H; Gulluoglu BM; Karanlik H; Sezer A; Calisir F Health Care Women Int; 2024; 45(3):363-372. PubMed ID: 34851241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic information based framework for personalized ranking of sustainable suppliers. Krishankumar R; Pamucar D; Pandey A; Kar S; Ravichandran KS Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(43):65371-65390. PubMed ID: 35486270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Vaccine selection for COVID-19 by AHP and novel VIKOR hybrid approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Meni Z B; Özkan EM Eng Appl Artif Intell; 2023 Mar; 119():105812. PubMed ID: 36624893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Risk assessment of deep-sea floating offshore wind power projects based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set considering trust relationship among experts. Mao Q; Gao Y; Fan J; Guo M; Chen J Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Apr; 196(4):405. PubMed ID: 38561557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel spherical fuzzy AHP-VIKOR methodology to determine serving petrol station selection during COVID-19 lockdown: A pilot study for İstanbul. Ayyildiz E; Taskin A Socioecon Plann Sci; 2022 Oct; 83():101345. PubMed ID: 35645424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rescuing emergency cases of COVID-19 patients: An intelligent real-time MSC transfusion framework based on multicriteria decision-making methods. Alsalem MA; Albahri OS; Zaidan AA; Al-Obaidi JR; Alnoor A; Alamoodi AH; Albahri AS; Zaidan BB; Jumaah FM Appl Intell (Dordr); 2022; 52(9):9676-9700. PubMed ID: 35035091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection. Kirişci M; Demir I; Şimşek N Artif Intell Med; 2022 May; 127():102278. PubMed ID: 35430046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation and Selection of HazMat Transportation Alternatives: A PHFLTS- and TOPSIS-Integrated Multi-Perspective Approach. Chen ZS; Li M; Kong WT; Chin KS Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(21):. PubMed ID: 31731510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative analysis of TOPSIS, VIKOR and COPRAS methods for the COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment. Hezer S; Gelmez E; Özceylan E J Infect Public Health; 2021 Jun; 14(6):775-786. PubMed ID: 34022737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Based on T-spherical fuzzy environment: A combination of FWZIC and FDOSM for prioritising COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients. Alsalem MA; Alsattar HA; Albahri AS; Mohammed RT; Albahri OS; Zaidan AA; Alnoor A; Alamoodi AH; Qahtan S; Zaidan BB; Aickelin U; Alazab M; Jumaah FM J Infect Public Health; 2021 Oct; 14(10):1513-1559. PubMed ID: 34538731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery. Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. COVID-19 safe campus evaluation for universities by a hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making model. Baskak D; Ozbey S; Yucesan M; Gul M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):8133-8153. PubMed ID: 36056282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Hybrid Fuzzy Decision Model for Evaluating MEMS and IC Integration Technologies. Lee QY; Lee MX; Lee YC Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33799935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Priority of a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation with a Normal Distribution in Meteorological Disaster Risk Assessment. Wang L; Gong Z Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 28994698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Evaluation Method of Low-Carbon Scenic Spots by Combining IBWM with B-DST and VIKOR in Fuzzy Environment. Liu A; Liu T; Ji X; Lu H; Li F Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31877681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comprehensive evaluation of land reclamation schemes in mining areas based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making. Wu J; Liu Y; Liu F; Gong H Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(58):87380-87392. PubMed ID: 35802335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A fuzzy hybrid decision-making framework for increasing the hospital disaster preparedness: The colombian case. Ortiz-Barrios M; Gul M; Yucesan M; Alfaro-Sarmiento I; Navarro-Jiménez E; Jiménez-Delgado G Int J Disaster Risk Reduct; 2022 Apr; 72():102831. PubMed ID: 35155097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A 2-order additive fuzzy measure identification method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic interaction degree and its application in credit assessment. Zhang M; Li WJ; Cao C Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8617. PubMed ID: 38616185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating treatment modalities in chronic pain treatment by the multi-criteria decision making procedure. Sir E; Batur Sir GD BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Oct; 19(1):191. PubMed ID: 31615483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness. Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]