These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33604012)
41. Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: the case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit. Gul M Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Dec; 26(4):705-718. PubMed ID: 29927709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An application of a hybrid MCDM method for the evaluation of entrepreneurial intensity among the SMEs: a case study. Rostamzadeh R; Ismail K; Bodaghi Khajeh Noubar H ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():703650. PubMed ID: 25197707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fuzzy-based multi-criteria decision analysis of environmental regulation and green economic efficiency in a post-COVID-19 scenario: the case of China. Yao S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jun; 28(24):30675-30701. PubMed ID: 33591551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluating the Preparedness of Indian States against COVID-19 Pandemic Risk: A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach. Choudhury S; Majumdar A; Saha AK; Majumdar P Risk Anal; 2022 Jan; 42(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 34424559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection. Gong JW; Liu HC; You XY; Yin L Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Apr; 102():107118. PubMed ID: 36570416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas. Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An Additive Consistency and Consensus Approach for Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations and Its Application in Failure Criticality Analysis. Wang Z; Ran Y; Jin C; Chen Y; Zhang G IEEE Trans Cybern; 2022 Nov; 52(11):12501-12513. PubMed ID: 34033569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Ortíz-Barrios M; Jaramillo-Rueda N; Gul M; Yucesan M; Jiménez-Delgado G; Alfaro-Saíz JJ Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of criteria and COVID-19 patients for intensive care unit admission in the era of pandemic: A multi-criteria decision making approach. Özkan B; Özceylan E; Kabak M; Dikmen AU Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 209():106348. PubMed ID: 34391998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Novel Distance Measures of Multigranular Unbalanced Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets Based on Semantics Intervals. Zhao Y; Jiang N; Deng X IEEE Trans Cybern; 2024 Apr; 54(4):2179-2192. PubMed ID: 36417713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Onüt S; Soner S Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evidence-Based Risk Mitigation and Stratification During COVID-19 for Return to Interventional Pain Practice: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines. Shah S; Diwan S; Soin A; Rajput K; Mahajan A; Manchikanti L; Kaye AD; Hirsch JA; Gharibo C Pain Physician; 2020 Aug; 23(4S):S161-S182. PubMed ID: 32942784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hesitant and uncertain linguistics based executive decision making using risk and regret aversion: Methods, implementation and analysis. Seth T; Muhuri PK MethodsX; 2024 Jun; 12():102706. PubMed ID: 38660028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Interval Grey Trapezoid Fuzzy Linguistic Variables. Yin K; Wang P; Li X Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Dec; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 29236071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Type-II fuzzy approach with explainable artificial intelligence for nature-based leisure travel destination selection amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Lin YC; Chen TT Digit Health; 2022; 8():20552076221106322. PubMed ID: 35707268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Hazardous Waste Disposal Enterprise Selection in China Using Hesitant Fuzzy PROMETHEE. Liang X; Miao J; Li Y; Yang X; Li Z Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32560196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Multi-attribute decision making based on VIKOR with probabilistic linguistic term sets: An application to the risk evaluation of foreign direct investment. Xu X; Zhang Y; Xu Z; Liao H; Tong Z PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0294758. PubMed ID: 38427701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The green-agile supplier selection problem for the medical devices: a hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach. Alamroshan F; La'li M; Yahyaei M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(5):6793-6811. PubMed ID: 34462856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of landfill sites using GIS-based MCDA with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Özkan B; Sarıçiçek İ; Özceylan E Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(34):42908-42932. PubMed ID: 32725564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]