171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33604996)
1. Masseter muscle activity of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis, and milled bar overdenture used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation: A within-subject study.
ELsyad MA; El-Asfahani IA; Kortam SA; Mourad SI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 33604996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electromyographic Connectivity of Masseter Muscle with Different Retentive Attachments for Implant Overdentures in Patients with Atrophied Mandibular Ridges: A Crossover Study.
ElSyad MA; Ibrahim AE; Nawar NHH; Belal TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1213–1222. PubMed ID: 30892293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Within-patient evaluation of chewing efficiency and maximum bite force of conventional dentures, fixed prostheses, and milled bar overdentures used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation of atrophied mandibular ridges: A short-term randomized trial.
ELsyad MA; Tella EAES; Mohamed SS; Mahrous AI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):522-531. PubMed ID: 35679127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1999 Sep; 78(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 10512389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chewing efficiency and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle with three designs of implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A cross-over study.
Elsyad MA; Hegazy SA; Hammouda NI; Al-Tonbary GY; Habib AA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 23445173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of mini-implant-supported mandibular overdentures on electromyographic activity of the masseter muscle during chewing of hard and soft food.
Ashmawy TM; El Talawy DB; Shaheen NH
Quintessence Int; 2014 Sep; 45(8):663-71. PubMed ID: 25019110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masticatory function with ball and resilient telescopic anchors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: A crossover study.
Elsyad MA; Shawky AF
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 28681044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Four-implant-supported fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdentures for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical and radiographic study.
ElSyad MA; Alameldeen HE; Elsaih EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1493–1503. PubMed ID: 31184639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.
Salami ZA; Jasser EM; Makzoumé JED; Boulos PJA
Gen Dent; 2020; 68(6):60-64. PubMed ID: 33136048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage: patient-based outcomes.
de Albuquerque Júnior RF; Lund JP; Tang L; Larivée J; de Grandmont P; Gauthier G; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Dec; 11(6):555-65. PubMed ID: 11168249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study.
Nabil MS; Mahanna FF; Said MM
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):672. PubMed ID: 38851676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Feine JS; Maskawi K; de Grandmont P; Donohue WB; Tanguay R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1646-56. PubMed ID: 7929979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neuromuscular coordination of masticatory muscles in subjects with two types of implant-supported prostheses.
Ferrario VF; Tartaglia GM; Maglione M; Simion M; Sforza C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 15008934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdenture for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation. A crossover study.
ELsyad MA; Elgamal M; Mohammed Askar O; Youssef Al-Tonbary G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 31410893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of varying implant position in immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
Shaarawy MA; Aboelross EM
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 23339758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part II. Comparisons of masticatory performance.
Garrett NR; Kapur KK; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Chen T
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):632-40. PubMed ID: 9627891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The masticatory efficiency of mandibular implant-supported overdentures as compared with tooth-supported overdentures and complete dentures.
Chen L; Xie Q; Feng H; Lin Y; Li J
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(5):238-43. PubMed ID: 12498473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
