171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33604996)
21. The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency.
Farias Neto A; Pereira BM; Xitara RL; Germano AR; Ribeiro JA; Mestriner Junior W; Carreiro Ada F
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e650-5. PubMed ID: 21916952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the Mean Bite Force and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary and Mandibular Complete Dentures vs Mandibular Implant-supported Over Denture.
Kumar A; Karthik KVGC; Sunkala L; Bejagam V; Rathore KK; Rai P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May; 23(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 35986459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Chewing efficiency and maximum bite force with different attachment systems of implant overdentures: a crossover study.
Elsyad MA; Khairallah AS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):677-682. PubMed ID: 27118683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in masticatory performance of edentulous patients treated with single-implant mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures.
Nogueira TE; Schimmel M; Leles CR
J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 30387869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An implant-supported, cobalt-chromium milled bar and nonflanged attachment-retained overdenture to rehabilitate the edentulous mandible.
Lowe LG; Shcherbukhin VM
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19573689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Different Attachments Used for Implant-Retained Overdentures in Subjects with Resorbed Mandibles: A Crossover Trial.
Mahanna FF; Elsyad MA; Mourad SI; Abozaed HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 32142580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. EMG activity of the masseter muscle in implant supported overdenture wearers during chewing of hard and soft food.
Karkazis HC
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Oct; 29(10):986-91. PubMed ID: 12421330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: psychometric evaluation and patient preference.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1997 Oct; 76(10):1675-83. PubMed ID: 9326900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical feasibility of mandibular implant overdenture retainers submitted to immediate load.
da Silva RJ; Issa JP; Semprini M; da Silva CH; de Vasconcelos PB; Celino CA; Siéssere S; Regalo SC
Gerodontology; 2011 Sep; 28(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20609008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of masticatory function of mandibular implant-supported overdenture wearers: A 3-year prospective study.
Khalid T; Yunus N; Ibrahim N; Saleh NBM; Goode D; Masood M
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):674-681. PubMed ID: 31952858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Masticatory performance and chewing experience with implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Geertman ME; Slagter AP; van 't Hof MA; van Waas MA; Kalk W
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10080319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Two-center clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus complete dentures-chewing ability.
Geertman ME; Boerrigter EM; Van't Hof MA; Van Waas MA; van Oort RP; Boering G; Kalk W
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1996 Feb; 24(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8833520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A 1-year prospective cohort study on mandibular overdentures retained by mini dental implants.
Scepanovic M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Markovic A; Delgardo-Ruiz R; Todorovic A; Milicic B; Misic T
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(4):367-79. PubMed ID: 23304690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part I: Methodology and clinical outcomes.
Kapur KK; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Ida R
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 9597609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Masticatory efficiency in complete denture and single implant-retained mandibular overdenture wearers with different occlusion schemes: A randomized clinical trial.
Rocha COM; Longhini D; Pereira RP; Lima ALO; Bonafé FSS; Arioli Filho JN
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):888-894. PubMed ID: 34517991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biting Force and Muscle Activity in Implant-Supported Single Mandibular Overdentures Opposing Fixed Maxillary Dentition.
Al-Magaleh WR; Abbas NA; Amer AA; Abdelkader AA; Bahgat B
Implant Dent; 2016 Apr; 25(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 26684910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of zirconia bar compared to cobalt chromium bar retaining mandibular implant overdenture: A crossover study.
Altonbary GY; Emera RMK
J Oral Rehabil; 2021 Jul; 48(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 33682180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
