These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3360523)
1. Doppler ultrasound of normally functioning mechanical mitral and aortic valve prostheses. Gibbs JL; Wharton GA; Williams GJ Int J Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 18(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 3360523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses. Brawley RK; Donahoo JS; Gott VL Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Panidis IP; Ross J; Mintz GS J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Aug; 8(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 2942593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Doppler haemodynamic profiles of clinically and echocardiographically normal mitral and aortic valve prostheses. Nihoyannopoulos P; Kambouroglou D; Athanassopoulos G; Nadazdin A; Smith P; Oakley CM Eur Heart J; 1992 Mar; 13(3):348-55. PubMed ID: 1597221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses]. Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves. Williams GA; Labovitz AJ Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Björk-Shiley prosthetic valves by real-time two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic flow mapping. Dittrich H; Nicod P; Hoit B; Dalton N; Sahn D Am Heart J; 1988 Jan; 115(1 Pt 1):133-8. PubMed ID: 3336968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of Doppler-obtained velocity curves in functional evaluation of mechanical prosthetic valves in the mitral and aortic positions. Goldrath N; Zimes R; Vered Z J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1988; 1(3):211-25. PubMed ID: 3272769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative phonocardiographic, echocardiographic and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of normally functioning Medtronic Hall and Björk-Shiley mitral prosthetic valves. Fukuda N; Oki T; Tabata T; Hosoi K; Iuchi A; Manabe K; Kageji Y; Sasaki M; Hama M; Ito S J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 8087264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regurgitant flow in apparently normal valve prostheses: improved detection and semiquantitative analysis by transesophageal two-dimensional color-coded Doppler echocardiography. Mohr-Kahaly S; Kupferwasser I; Erbel R; Oelert H; Meyer J J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1990; 3(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 2372401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses. Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Results of valve substitution with the Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster oscillating-disc prostheses]. Casarotto D; Bortolotti U; Betti D; Chioin R; Rizzoli G; de Mozzi P; Gallucci V Minerva Cardioangiol; 1979; 27(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 471231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic-Hall valve: experience with 370 implanted valves. Butchart EG; Griffiths BE; Breckenridge IM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 May; 31 Spec 2():81-4. PubMed ID: 6192541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses. Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of valve type and valve function on chronic intravascular hemolysis after alloprosthetic mitral and aortic valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Aul C; Seipel L; Körfer R; Budde T; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1983 Feb; 72(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 6845808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pulsed Doppler echocardiography in prosthetic aortic and mitral valve replacement]. Mattern H; Fricke G Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Jan; 64(2):76-85. PubMed ID: 3951167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Björk-Shiley prosthetic values. Sagar KB; Wann LS; Paulsen WH; Romhilt DW J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 7(3):681-7. PubMed ID: 3950245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of the Medtronic-Hall pivoting disc heart valve prosthesis. Yoganathan AP; Stevenson DM; Williams FP; Woo YR; Franch RH; Harrison EC Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982; 16(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 6221405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Hemodynamics after mitral valve replacement with Starr-Edwards, Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster protheses (author's transl)]. Haerten K; Both A; Lück J; Herzer J; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1977 May; 66(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 878552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]