These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3360523)
61. Late results of aortic valve replacement with Bjork Shiley prostheses: a comparison of standard aortic valve prosthesis with reversed mitral valve prosthesis implanted in aortic position. Kaul TK; Mercer JL Int J Artif Organs; 1989 Nov; 12(11):728-32. PubMed ID: 2599673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of functional parameters of mechanical and biological valve prostheses]. De Gaetano G; Barberis L; Dottori V; Parodi E; Passerone GC; Lijoi A; Kandil H; Gnecco G; Badano L; Venere G Minerva Cardioangiol; 1993 Sep; 41(9):365-70. PubMed ID: 8259231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Long term results of isolated mitral and aortic valve replacement. A statistical evaluation. Pellegrini A; Peronace B; Marcazzan E; Rossi C J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1983; 24(5):467-74. PubMed ID: 6654959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A prospective controlled trial of St. Jude versus Starr Edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses. Murday AJ; Hochstitzky A; Mansfield J; Miles J; Taylor B; Whitley E; Treasure T Ann Thorac Surg; 2003 Jul; 76(1):66-73; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 12842515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [Intravascular hemolysis following prosthetic heart valve replacement: influence of type and position of artificial valves (author's transl)]. Flohr E; Bischoff KO; Hager W Z Kardiol; 1977 Jul; 66(7):394-8. PubMed ID: 899139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The suprasternal approach to recording aortic valve prostheses: a comparison with the precordial and subxiphoid approaches. Kasper W; Treese N; Kageneck V; Pop T; Meinertz T Int J Cardiol; 1983 May; 3(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 6862703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Clinical and hemodynamic sequelae of mitral prostheses evaluated by Doppler echocardiography]. Iwahashi K; Ota T; Sato H; Kanda H; Sugimoto T; Okada M; Nakamura K J Cardiol; 1992; 22(4):651-9. PubMed ID: 1343631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Limitation of Doppler echocardiography in evaluation of aortic valve prostheses]]. Geibel A; Kasper W; Fraedrich G; Konstantinides S; Schöllhorn J; Tiede N; Just H Z Kardiol; 1993 Mar; 82(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 8475654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Doppler sonographic evaluation of the CarboMedics bileaflet valve prosthesis: one-year experience. Globits S; Rödler S; Mayr H; Moritz A; Mlczoch J; Glogar D; Wolner E J Card Surg; 1992 Mar; 7(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 1554982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Regurgitant flow of mitral valve prostheses: an intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic study. Meloni L; Aru G; Abbruzzese PA; Cardu G; Ricchi A; Cattolica FS; Martelli V; Cherchi A J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1994; 7(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 8155332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Evaluation of stentless kangaroo aortic valves in the mitral position of juvenile sheep. Hodge AJ; Neethling WM; Glancy R J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jul; 13(4):681-8. PubMed ID: 15311878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements]. Mühlberger V; Schistek R; Hopferwieser T; Schwaiger A; Scharfetter H; Knapp E Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study. Baumgartner H; Khan SS; DeRobertis M; Czer LS; Maurer G Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2275-83. PubMed ID: 1591841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Starr-Edwards valves at the aortic and mitral positions implanted for 39 years. Misawa S; Aizawa K; Kaminishi Y; Muraoka A; Misawa Y Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Jun; 59(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 21674313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Long-term Doppler echocardiographic results of aortic or mitral valve replacement with Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén PS; Berggren HE; Larsson S; Roberts B; Wallentin I; Caidahl K J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Oct; 116(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 9766588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Does the mitral valve prosthesis adversely affect the hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve prosthesis in patients with double valve replacement? Spiliotopoulos K; Armstrong S; Maganti M; David TE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S74-7. PubMed ID: 22104672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Replacement of a Björk-Shiley Delrin aortic valve still functioning after 25 years. Badak MI; Ozkisacik EA; Boga M; Gurcun U; Discigil B Tex Heart Inst J; 2004; 31(3):303-5; discussion 305. PubMed ID: 15562853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Comparison of transesophageal color flow Doppler imaging of normal mitral regurgitant jets in St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall cardiac prostheses. Hixson CS; Smith MD; Mattson MD; Morris EJ; Lenhoff SJ; Salley RK J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1992; 5(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 1739472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]