These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33607333)

  • 1. Validation of a machine learning-derived clinical metric to quantify outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Roche C; Kumar V; Overman S; Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Routman H; Teredesai A; Zuckerman J
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2211-2224. PubMed ID: 33607333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients who achieve ceiling scores with 3 common patient-reported outcome measures.
    Schoch BS; King JJ; Fan W; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Roche CP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1647-1657. PubMed ID: 35247571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exactech Equinoxe anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: case controlled comparisons using the machine learning-derived Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score.
    Marigi EM; Hao KA; Friedman RJ; Greene AT; Roche CP; Wright TW; King JJ; Schoch BS
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Apr; 32(4):793-802. PubMed ID: 39292145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying success after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
    Nieboer MJ; Hao KA; Tams C; King JJ; Wright TW; Parsons M; Schoch BS; Simovitch RW
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Dec; 32(12):2501-2507. PubMed ID: 37302621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stratification of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after total shoulder arthroplasty by implant type, preoperative diagnosis, and sex.
    Simovitch RW; Elwell J; Colasanti CA; Hao KA; Friedman RJ; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Roche CP; Zuckerman JD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Sep; 33(9):e492-e506. PubMed ID: 38461936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal and substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
    Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Turnbull LM; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Mar; 33(3):593-603. PubMed ID: 37778654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying success after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
    Hao KA; Tams C; Nieboer MJ; King JJ; Wright TW; Simovitch RW; Parsons M; Schoch BS
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Apr; 32(4):688-694. PubMed ID: 36681108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What Is the Accuracy of Three Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty?
    Kumar V; Roche C; Overman S; Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman J; Routman H; Teredesai A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 32332242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying success after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
    Hao KA; Cueto RJ; Tams C; King JJ; Wright TW; Parsons M; Schoch BS; Simovitch RW
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2303-2309. PubMed ID: 37245624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state.
    Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Burns MQ; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Oct; 32(10):e516-e527. PubMed ID: 37178967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-year clinical outcomes and complication rates in anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty implanted with Exactech GPS intraoperative navigation.
    Youderian AR; Greene AT; Polakovic SV; Davis NZ; Parsons M; Papandrea RF; Jones RB; Byram IR; Gobbato BB; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Dec; 32(12):2519-2532. PubMed ID: 37348780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying success after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
    Nieboer MJ; Hao KA; Tams C; King JJ; Wright TW; Simovitch RW; Parsons M; Schoch BS
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2296-2302. PubMed ID: 37245623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of the Walch classification for patients before and after shoulder arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.
    Simovitch RW; Hao KA; Elwell J; Antuna S; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Roche CP; Ehrlich ZA; Colasanti C; Zuckerman JD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; 33(1):108-120. PubMed ID: 37778653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart Score Correlates Well With Legacy Outcome Scores Without a Ceiling Effect.
    King JJ; Wright L; Hao KA; Roche C; Wright TW; Vasilopoulos T; Zuckerman JD; Flurin PH; Schoch BS
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2023 Jan; 31(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 36580051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are Age and Patient Gender Associated With Different Rates and Magnitudes of Clinical Improvement After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?
    Friedman RJ; Cheung EV; Flurin PH; Wright T; Simovitch RW; Bolch C; Roche CP; Zuckerman JD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1264-1273. PubMed ID: 29601384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty.
    Tashjian RZ; Hung M; Keener JD; Bowen RC; McAllister J; Chen W; Ebersole G; Granger EK; Chamberlain AM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Jan; 26(1):144-148. PubMed ID: 27545048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of cervical spine pathology on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Colasanti CA; Lin CC; Simovitch RW; Virk MS; Zuckerman JD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e117-e128. PubMed ID: 36179961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responsiveness and Internal Validity of Common Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Sciascia AD; Morris BJ; Jacobs CA; Edwards TB
    Orthopedics; 2017 May; 40(3):e513-e519. PubMed ID: 28358978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty: what are we actually measuring?
    Cronin KJ; Magnuson JA; Murphy ML; Unger RZ; Jacobs CA; Blake MH
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 May; 30(5):1174-1180. PubMed ID: 32890679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after prior contralateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with bilateral primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.
    Turnbull LM; Hao KA; Bindi VE; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; Struk AM; Schoch BS; King JJ
    Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):801-807. PubMed ID: 38032497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.