These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3360734)

  • 1. Anatomically correct dolls: should they be used as the basis for expert testimony?
    Yates A; Terr L
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1988 Mar; 27(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 3360734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Issue continued: anatomically correct dolls: should they be used as the basis for expert testimony?
    Yates A; Terr L
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1988 May; 27(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3379023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: developmental and gender comparisons.
    Bruck M; Ceci SJ; Francoeur E
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Mar; 6(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 10937313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dolls.
    White S; Strom GA; Santilli G; Halpin BM
    Child Abuse Negl; 1986; 10(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 3791029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experiences with ritualist child sexual abuse: a case study from The Netherlands.
    Jonker F; Jonker-Bakker P
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 2043971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
    Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
    Samra J; Yuille JC
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The parent-child interview: use in evaluating child allegations of sexual abuse by the parent.
    Faller KC; Froning ML; Lipovsky J
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1991 Oct; 61(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 1746630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expert testimony regarding child sexual abuse.
    Myers JE
    Child Abuse Negl; 1993; 17(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 8435782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessing credibility in suspected sexual abuse of children].
    Volbert R
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr; 1995 Mar; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 7771120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children's behavioral responses to anatomically correct dolls.
    August RL; Forman BD
    Child Psychiatry Hum Dev; 1989; 20(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 2766873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert psychological testimony in cases of alleged child sexual abuse.
    McAnulty RD
    Arch Sex Behav; 1993 Aug; 22(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 8368914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of anatomically correct dolls in the evaluation of sexually abused children.
    Goldberg CC; Yates A
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Dec; 144(12):1334-6. PubMed ID: 2244615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Child sexual abuse and forensic psychiatry: evolving and controversial issues.
    Burton K; Myers WC
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(4):439-53. PubMed ID: 1482798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children with anatomically correct dolls.
    Jampole L; Weber MK
    Child Abuse Negl; 1987; 11(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 3594279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?
    Buck JA; London K; Wright DB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 20443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
    Glaser D; Collins C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Putting the puzzle together: validating allegations of child sexual abuse.
    Heiman ML
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1992 Feb; 33(2):311-29. PubMed ID: 1564076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.