These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33607373)
1. The mammographic breast density distribution of Finnish women with breast cancer and comparison of breast density reporting using the 4 Nykänen A; Okuma H; Sutela A; Masarwah A; Vanninen R; Sudah M Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109585. PubMed ID: 33607373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement. Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study. Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in Breast Density Reporting Patterns of Radiologists After Publication of the 5th Edition BI-RADS Guidelines: A Single Institution Experience. Irshad A; Leddy R; Lewis M; Cluver A; Ackerman S; Pavic D; Collins H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):943-948. PubMed ID: 28796548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS. Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of the Interaction Between Mammographic Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Menopausal Status With Breast Cancer Risk Among Korean Women. Tran TXM; Moon SG; Kim S; Park B JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2139161. PubMed ID: 34940866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mammographic density patterns in women from Torreon, Coahuila]. Martínez-García E; Cortés-Sánchez JL; Ovalle-Escalera CN; González-Cortés T; Haro-Santa Cruz J; Sarmiento-Martínez HI Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2021 Feb; 59(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 33667045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening. Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation. Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification. Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Associations between mammographic density and tumor characteristics in Chinese women with breast cancer. Li E; Guida JL; Tian Y; Sung H; Koka H; Li M; Chan A; Zhang H; Tang E; Guo C; Deng J; Hu N; Lu N; Gierach GL; Li J; Yang XR Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Sep; 177(2):527-536. PubMed ID: 31254158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes? Posso M; Louro J; Sánchez M; Román M; Vidal C; Sala M; Baré M; Castells X; Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():81-87. PubMed ID: 30599878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations. Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of background echotexture on automated breast ultrasound using BI-RADS and modified classification: Association with clinical features and mammographic density. Choi EJ; Choi H; Byon JH; Youk JH J Clin Ultrasound; 2023 May; 51(4):687-695. PubMed ID: 37014174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories. Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]