These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33607916)

  • 1. Comparison of the Accuracy of WhipPredict to That of a Modified Version of the Short-Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire to Predict Poor Recovery After Whiplash Injury.
    Sterling M; Ritchie C; Rebbeck T; Cameron ID; Griffin A; Jagnoor J; Nicholas M; Nguyen H; Warren J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2021 May; 51(5):207-215. PubMed ID: 33607916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive recovery for low-risk injuries screened by the short form - Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire following road traffic injury: evidence from an inception cohort study in New South Wales, Australia.
    Nguyen H; Rebbeck T; Kifley A; Jagnoor J; Dinh M; Shetty A; Nicholas M; Cameron ID
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):531. PubMed ID: 31722704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Which tool for what purpose? A semi-systematic review.
    Lheureux A; Berquin A
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 May; 62(3):178-188. PubMed ID: 30342997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do expectations of recovery improve risk assessment for people with whiplash-associated disorders? Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.
    Griffin AR; Sterling M; Ritchie C; Kifley A; Jagnoor J; Cameron ID; Rebbeck T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Apr; 23(1):395. PubMed ID: 35477438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire Short-Form and STarT Back Screening Tool: Correlation and Agreement Analysis.
    Fuhro FF; Fagundes FRC; Manzoni ACT; Costa LOP; Cabral CMN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Aug; 41(15):E931-E936. PubMed ID: 26720177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting Return to Work in a Heterogeneous Sample of Recently Injured Workers Using the Brief ÖMPSQ-SF.
    Nicholas MK; Costa DSJ; Linton SJ; Main CJ; Shaw WS; Pearce R; Gleeson M; Pinto RZ; Blyth FM; McCauley JH; Maher CG; Smeets RJEM; McGarity A
    J Occup Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 29(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 29796980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Derivation of a clinical prediction rule to identify both chronic moderate/severe disability and full recovery following whiplash injury.
    Ritchie C; Hendrikz J; Kenardy J; Sterling M
    Pain; 2013 Oct; 154(10):2198-2206. PubMed ID: 23831865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural and construct validity of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire in adults with acute whiplash-associated disorders.
    Stupar M; Côté P; Beaton DE; Boyle E; Cassidy JD
    Spine J; 2015 Nov; 15(11):2369-77. PubMed ID: 26165476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Course of recovery for whiplash associated disorders in a compensation setting.
    Casey PP; Feyer AM; Cameron ID
    Injury; 2015 Nov; 46(11):2118-29. PubMed ID: 26372230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. StressModEx--Physiotherapist-led Stress Inoculation Training integrated with exercise for acute whiplash injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Ritchie C; Kenardy J; Smeets R; Sterling M
    J Physiother; 2015 Jul; 61(3):157. PubMed ID: 26092388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional health status in subjects after a motor vehicle accident, with emphasis on whiplash associated disorders: design of a descriptive, prospective inception cohort study.
    Schmitt MA; van Meeteren NL; de Wijer A; Helders PJ; Graaf Yv
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Dec; 9():168. PubMed ID: 19099574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responsiveness of the cervical Northern American Spine Society questionnaire (NASS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in chronic whiplash.
    Angst F; Verra ML; Lehmann S; Gysi F; Benz T; Aeschlimann A
    Clin Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 26(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 21856722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discriminative and Predictive Analysis of the Brazilian Version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) Short-Form in Patients With Low Back Pain.
    Fuhro FF; Fagundes FRC; Manzoni ACT; Cabral CMN
    J Chiropr Med; 2021 Dec; 20(4):191-198. PubMed ID: 35496720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancements in Imaging Technology: Do They (or Will They) Equate to Advancements in Our Knowledge of Recovery in Whiplash?
    Elliott JM; Dayanidhi S; Hazle C; Hoggarth MA; McPherson J; Sparks CL; Weber KA
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Oct; 46(10):862-873. PubMed ID: 27690836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The predictive value of subsets of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for return to work in chronic low back pain.
    Opsommer E; Rivier G; Crombez G; Hilfiker R
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Jun; 53(3):359-365. PubMed ID: 28382810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire-Short Form and 2-year follow-up of registered work disability.
    Heikkala E; Oura P; Ruokolainen O; Ala-Mursula L; Linton SJ; Karppinen J
    Eur J Public Health; 2023 Jun; 33(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 37192056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool and the Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with acute or subacute back and neck pain.
    Forsbrand M; Grahn B; Hill JC; Petersson IF; Sennehed CP; Stigmar K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 28222707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of a guideline-based clinical pathway of care to improve health outcomes following whiplash injury (Whiplash ImPaCT): protocol of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Rebbeck T; Leaver A; Bandong AN; Kenardy J; Refshauge K; Connelly L; Cameron I; Mitchell G; Willcock S; Ritchie C; Jagnoor J; Sterling M
    J Physiother; 2016 Apr; 62(2):111. PubMed ID: 26996096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of the Turkish Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire-short form.
    Özdinç S; Pekçetin S; Can H; Ata H; Süslü B; Birtane M
    Work; 2022; 72(1):333-341. PubMed ID: 35466918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in chronic low back pain.
    Hilfiker R; Knutti IA; Raval-Roland B; Rivier G; Crombez G; Opsommer E
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2741-9. PubMed ID: 27272277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.