BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33608619)

  • 1. Deep learning-based grading of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast histopathology images.
    Wetstein SC; Stathonikos N; Pluim JPW; Heng YJ; Ter Hoeve ND; Vreuls CPH; van Diest PJ; Veta M
    Lab Invest; 2021 Apr; 101(4):525-533. PubMed ID: 33608619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of an e-learning module on grading variation of (pre)malignant breast lesions.
    van Dooijeweert C; Deckers IAG; de Ruiter EJ; Ter Hoeve ND; Vreuls CPH; van der Wall E; van Diest PJ
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 32404951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
    Alghamdi SA; Krishnamurthy K; Garces Narvaez SA; Algashaamy KJ; Aoun J; Reis IM; Recine MA; Jorda M; Poppiti RJ; Gomez-Fernandez CR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 153(3):360-367. PubMed ID: 31769792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.
    Schuh F; Biazús JV; Resetkova E; Benfica CZ; Ventura Ade F; Uchoa D; Graudenz M; Edelweiss MI
    Diagn Pathol; 2015 Jul; 10():93. PubMed ID: 26159429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
    Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a nationwide study of 4901 patients in the Netherlands.
    van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Willems SM; Kuijpers CCHJ; Overbeek LIH; Deckers IAG
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(2):479-488. PubMed ID: 30539380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Tosteson ANA; Carney PA; Geller BM; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Oster NV; Pepe MS; Elmore JG
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():39-47. PubMed ID: 28535496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of deep learning on mammographies to discriminate between low and high-risk DCIS for patient participation in active surveillance trials.
    Alaeikhanehshir S; Voets MM; van Duijnhoven FH; Lips EH; Groen EJ; van Oirsouw MCJ; Hwang SE; Lo JY; Wesseling J; Mann RM; Teuwen J;
    Cancer Imaging; 2024 Apr; 24(1):48. PubMed ID: 38576031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grading variation in 2,934 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the effect of laboratory- and pathologist-specific feedback reports.
    van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Baas IO; van der Wall E; Deckers IAG
    Diagn Pathol; 2020 May; 15(1):52. PubMed ID: 32393303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non-Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma
    Pareja F; Brown DN; Lee JY; Da Cruz Paula A; Selenica P; Bi R; Geyer FC; Gazzo A; da Silva EM; Vahdatinia M; Stylianou AA; Ferrando L; Wen HY; Hicks JB; Weigelt B; Reis-Filho JS
    Clin Cancer Res; 2020 Jul; 26(14):3682-3693. PubMed ID: 32220886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-observer variability between general pathologists and a specialist in breast pathology in the diagnosis of lobular neoplasia, columnar cell lesions, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Gomes DS; Porto SS; Balabram D; Gobbi H
    Diagn Pathol; 2014 Jun; 9():121. PubMed ID: 24948027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ among an international group of pathologists.
    van Seijen M; Jóźwiak K; Pinder SE; Hall A; Krishnamurthy S; Thomas JS; Collins LC; Bijron J; Bart J; Cohen D; Ng W; Bouybayoune I; Stobart H; Hudecek J; Schaapveld M; Thompson A; Lips EH; Wesseling J;
    J Pathol Clin Res; 2021 May; 7(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 33620141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A deep learning model for breast ductal carcinoma in situ classification in whole slide images.
    Kanavati F; Ichihara S; Tsuneki M
    Virchows Arch; 2022 May; 480(5):1009-1022. PubMed ID: 35076741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Predict Grade, Microinvasion, and Invasion in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
    Hussein H; Chung C; Moshonov H; Miller N; Kulkarni SR; Scaranelo AM
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1483-8. PubMed ID: 26391856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma
    Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
    Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver Variability in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
    Van Bockstal MR; Berlière M; Duhoux FP; Galant C
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2020 Oct; 154(5):596-609. PubMed ID: 32566938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast density, scintimammographic (99m)Tc(V)DMSA uptake, and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in mixed invasive ductal associated with extensive in situ ductal carcinoma (IDC + DCIS) and pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) status, proliferation index Ki-67, and histological grade.
    Papantoniou V; Sotiropoulou E; Valsamaki P; Tsaroucha A; Sotiropoulou M; Ptohis N; Stipsanelli A; Dimitrakakis K; Marinopoulos S; Tsiouris S; Antsaklis A
    Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 20143189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deep learning-based breast cancer grading and survival analysis on whole-slide histopathology images.
    Wetstein SC; de Jong VMT; Stathonikos N; Opdam M; Dackus GMHE; Pluim JPW; van Diest PJ; Veta M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15102. PubMed ID: 36068311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.