These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33609251)

  • 1. Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience.
    Balasubramanian S; Chittawadagi B; Misra S; Ramakrishnan P; Chinnusamy P
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 33609251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).
    van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van der Horst S; Verhage RJ; Besselink MG; Prins MJ; Haverkamp L; Schippers C; Rinkes IH; Joore HC; Ten Kate FJ; Koffijberg H; Kroese CC; van Leeuwen MS; Lolkema MP; Reerink O; Schipper ME; Steenhagen E; Vleggaar FP; Voest EE; Siersema PD; van Hillegersberg R
    Trials; 2012 Nov; 13():230. PubMed ID: 23199187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
    Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
    Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably with those of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy.
    Perry KA; Enestvedt CK; Diggs BS; Jobe BA; Hunter JG
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Sep; 23(9):2147-54. PubMed ID: 19116744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients.
    Palanivelu C; Prakash A; Senthilkumar R; Senthilnathan P; Parthasarathi R; Rajan PS; Venkatachlam S
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jul; 203(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 16798482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: safety, perioperative morbidity and short-term oncological outcome-a single institution experience.
    Sayed AI; Goel S; Aggarwal A; Singh S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 34228249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
    Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
    Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy to a hybrid robotic-assisted thoracoscopic approach: a single-center experience over two decades.
    Angehrn FV; Neuschütz KJ; Fourie L; Wilhelm A; Däster S; Ackermann C; von Flüe M; Steinemann DC; Bolli M
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Jun; 407(4):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 35332369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Chao YK; Hsieh MJ; Liu YH; Liu HP
    World J Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(2):590-598. PubMed ID: 28801820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.
    Dunn DH; Johnson EM; Morphew JA; Dilworth HP; Krueger JL; Banerji N
    Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 22394116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
    Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Zhang Y; Han Y; Gan Q; Xiang J; Jin R; Chen K; Che J; Hang J; Li H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1284-1291. PubMed ID: 30843161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
    Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
    JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.
    Yamashita K; Makino T; Yamasaki M; Tanaka K; Hara T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1-8. PubMed ID: 28881906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
    Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
    Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.