84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33609389)
1. Impact of operative time on textbook outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy, a risk-adjusted analysis from a high-volume center.
Yang Y; Jiang C; Liu Z; Zhu K; Yu B; Yuan C; Qi C; Li Z
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3195-3203. PubMed ID: 38632118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre- and intra-operative risk factors predict postoperative respiratory failure after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Yu B; Liu Z; Zhang L; Pan J; Jiang C; Li C; Li Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Mar; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 38492559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer in patients with HIV/AIDS: considerations and future directions.
Davakis S; Syllaios A; Meropouli A; Kyros E; Vagios I; Mpaili E; Sdralis E; Charalabopoulos A
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2020 Nov; 102(9):e1-e3. PubMed ID: 32513017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomotic Audit (OGAA) Collaborative
Br J Surg; 2022 Apr; 109(5):439-449. PubMed ID: 35194634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
BJS Open; 2021 May; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 35179183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of surgical complications on long-term prognosis following oesophagectomy.
Broadbent A; Rahman S; Grace B; Walker R; Noble F; Kelly J; Byrne J; Underwood T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 49(10):106930. PubMed ID: 37258358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognosis of Interval Distant Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer.
Kroese TE; Dijksterhuis WPM; van Rossum PSN; Verhoeven RHA; Mook S; Haj Mohammad N; Hulshof MCCM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Oijen MGH; Ruurda JP; van Laarhoven HWM; van Hillegersberg R
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):482-490. PubMed ID: 33610543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of curative esophageal cancer surgery in elderly: A meta-analysis.
Baranov NS; Slootmans C; van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Schoon Y; Rosman C
World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2021 Feb; 13(2):131-146. PubMed ID: 33643529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience.
Simitian GS; Hall DJ; Leverson G; Lushaj EB; Lewis EE; Musgrove KA; McCarthy DP; Maloney JD
Surg Open Sci; 2023 Jan; 11():26-32. PubMed ID: 36444286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term survival outcomes of esophageal cancer after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Pather K; Mobley EM; Guerrier C; Esma R; Kendall H; Awad ZT
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 35209914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Completely minimally invasive versus hybrid Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer: a UK multi-centre comparative study.
Patel K; Askari A; Abbassi O; Jayanthi NV; Claydon O; Laycock J; Ramalingam A; Kumar B; Wong J; Aly M; Jambulingam P;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5822-5832. PubMed ID: 35044515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome of microscopically non-radical oesophagectomy for oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional cancer: nationwide cohort study.
Hollertz P; Lindblad M; Sandström P; Halldestam I; Edholm D
BJS Open; 2021 May; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 33972990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Siaw-Acheampong K; Kamarajah SK; Gujjuri R; Bundred JR; Singh P; Griffiths EA
BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):787-803. PubMed ID: 32894001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series.
Findlay L; Yao C; Bennett DH; Byrom R; Davies N
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3681-3689. PubMed ID: 28078465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does minimally invasive oesophagectomy provide a benefit in hospital length of stay when compared with open oesophagectomy?
Rodham P; Batty JA; McElnay PJ; Immanuel A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 26669851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and individual patient data comparing minimally invasive with open oesophagectomy for cancer.
Müller-Stich BP; Probst P; Nienhüser H; Fazeli S; Senft J; Kalkum E; Heger P; Warschkow R; Nickel F; Billeter AT; Grimminger PP; Gutschow C; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Piessen G; Paireder M; Schoppmann SF; van der Peet DL; Cuesta MA; van der Sluis P; van Hillegersberg R; Hölscher AH; Diener MK; Schmidt T
Br J Surg; 2021 Sep; 108(9):1026-1033. PubMed ID: 34491293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Yibulayin W; Abulizi S; Lv H; Sun W
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 14(1):304. PubMed ID: 27927246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications and survival after hybrid and fully minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Veenstra MMK; Smithers BM; Visser E; Edholm D; Brosda S; Thomas JM; Gotley DC; Thomson IG; Wijnhoven BPL; Barbour AP
BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
