230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33609398)
1. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Radiotherapy on Patient-reported Outcomes of Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction With and Without Mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Ann Surg; 2022 May; 275(5):992-1001. PubMed ID: 32657919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.
Potter S; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Williamson PR; Whisker L; Thrush S; Skillman J; Barnes NLP; Mylvaganam S; Teasdale E; Jain A; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Holcombe C; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):254-266. PubMed ID: 30639093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Frisell J; Brandberg Y
BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 32762012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.
Casella D; Di Taranto G; Marcasciano M; Sordi S; Kothari A; Kovacs T; Lo Torto F; Cigna E; Calabrese C; Ribuffo D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):1e-9e. PubMed ID: 30303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.
Harvey KL; Sinai P; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Br J Surg; 2022 May; 109(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 35576373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate Breast Cancer Reconstruction with or without Dermal Matrix or Synthetic Mesh Support: A Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Murphy D; O'Donnell JP; Ryan ÉJ; Lane O'Neill B; Boland MR; Lowery AJ; Kerin MJ; McInerney NM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):563e-574e. PubMed ID: 36729988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate surgical mesh-free implant-based breast reconstruction with fascial flap in breast cancer patients after mastectomy.
Chen AX; Chen X; Yu Y; Wang X; Zhang B; Cao XC
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1941-1948. PubMed ID: 36477273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subpectoral versus prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction: A propensity score-matched analysis of 30-day morbidity and long-term outcomes.
Escandón JM; Sweitzer K; Christiano JG; Gooch JC; Olzinski AT; Prieto PA; Skinner KA; Langstein HN; Manrique OJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Jan; 76():76-87. PubMed ID: 36513014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Submuscular-Dermal-Mesh Pocket.
Bonomi S; Sala L; Gennaro M; Ricci C; Cortinovis U
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 82(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30247191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.
Becherer BE; Heeg E; Young-Afat DA; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Rakhorst HA; Mureau MAM;
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 36729987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire.
Mylvaganam S; Conroy E; Williamson PR; Barnes NLP; Cutress RI; Gardiner MD; Jain A; Skillman JM; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Blazeby JM; Potter S; Holcombe C; ;
Breast; 2017 Oct; 35():182-190. PubMed ID: 28768227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
Roberts K; Mills N; Metcalfe C; Lane A; Clement C; Hollingworth W; Taylor J; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Fairhurst K; Whisker L; Cutress R; Thrush S; Fairbrother P; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050886. PubMed ID: 34848516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
