These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33609833)

  • 1. Life cycle comparison of marine fuels for IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap.
    Bilgili L
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 774():145719. PubMed ID: 33609833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of cold start on engine performance and emissions from diesel engines using IMO-Compliant distillate fuels.
    Chu Van T; Zare A; Jafari M; Bodisco TA; Surawski N; Verma P; Suara K; Ristovski Z; Rainey T; Stevanovic S; Brown RJ
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 2):113260. PubMed ID: 31622808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demonstration of fuel switching on oceangoing vessels in the Gulf of Mexico.
    Browning L; Hartley S; Bandemehr A; Gathright K; Miller W
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Sep; 62(9):1093-101. PubMed ID: 23019823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From maritime salvage to IMO 2020 strategy: Two actions to protect the environment.
    Sáez Álvarez P
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2021 Sep; 170():112590. PubMed ID: 34171628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental policy constraints for acidic exhaust gas scrubber discharges from ships.
    Ülpre H; Eames I
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Nov; 88(1-2):292-301. PubMed ID: 25284442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short and long-term effects of low-sulphur fuels on marine zooplankton communities.
    Jönander C; Dahllöf I
    Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Oct; 227():105592. PubMed ID: 32891020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emissions tradeoffs among alternative marine fuels: total fuel cycle analysis of residual oil, marine gas oil, and marine diesel oil.
    Corbett JJ; Winebrake JJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Apr; 58(4):538-42. PubMed ID: 18422040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Method for reduction of the NO
    Puškár M; Kopas M; Puškár D; Lumnitzer J; Faltinová E
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Feb; 127():752-760. PubMed ID: 28847635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total life cycle emissions of post-Panamax containerships powered by conventional fuel or natural gas.
    Hua J; Cheng CW; Hwang DS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30067463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs.
    Sofiev M; Winebrake JJ; Johansson L; Carr EW; Prank M; Soares J; Vira J; Kouznetsov R; Jalkanen JP; Corbett JJ
    Nat Commun; 2018 Feb; 9(1):406. PubMed ID: 29410475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of seawater scrubbing on a microplanktonic community during a summer-bloom in the Baltic Sea.
    Ytreberg E; Karlberg M; Hassellöv IM; Hedblom M; Nylund AT; Salo K; Imberg H; Turner D; Tripp L; Yong J; Wulff A
    Environ Pollut; 2021 Dec; 291():118251. PubMed ID: 34592329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of thermal optical analysis method of elemental carbon for marine fuel exhaust.
    Lappi MK; Ristimäki JM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1298-1318. PubMed ID: 28548907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operation of marine diesel engines on biogenic fuels: modification of emissions and resulting climate effects.
    Petzold A; Lauer P; Fritsche U; Hasselbach J; Lichtenstern M; Schlager H; Fleischer F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10394-400. PubMed ID: 22044020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The doubtful environmental benefit of reduced maximum sulfur limit in international shipping fuel.
    Mestl T; Løvoll G; Stensrud E; Le Breton A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jun; 47(12):6098-101. PubMed ID: 23713707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energy use and emissions from marine vessels: a total fuel life cycle approach.
    Winebrake JJ; Corbett JJ; Meyer PE
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Jan; 57(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 17269235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Study of Light Cycle Oil and Naphthalene as an Adequate Additive to Improve the Stability of Marine Fuels.
    Vráblík A; Schlehöfer D; Dlasková Jaklová K; Hidalgo Herrador JM; Černý R
    ACS Omega; 2022 Jan; 7(2):2127-2136. PubMed ID: 35071901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical analysis of economic and environmental benefits of marine fuel conversion from diesel oil to natural gas for container ships.
    Elkafas AG; Elgohary MM; Shouman MR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(12):15210-15222. PubMed ID: 33236307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Life cycle assessment of the use of alternative fuels in cement kilns: A case study.
    Georgiopoulou M; Lyberatos G
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 216():224-234. PubMed ID: 28716294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental investigation on NOx and green house gas emissions from a marine auxiliary diesel engine using ultralow sulfur light fuel.
    Geng P; Tan Q; Zhang C; Wei L; He X; Cao E; Jiang K
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():467-475. PubMed ID: 27544351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental sustainability of cooking fuels in remote communities: Life cycle and local impacts.
    Aberilla JM; Gallego-Schmid A; Stamford L; Azapagic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 713():136445. PubMed ID: 31955079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.