221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33610330)
41. Hydrothermal aging affects the three-dimensional fit and fatigue lifetime of zirconia abutments.
Bergamo ETP; Campos TMB; Lopes ACO; Cardoso KB; Gouvea MVR; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Witek L; Gierthmühlen PC; Coelho PG; Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Zahoui A; de Carvalho LF; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104832. PubMed ID: 34536801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The influence of abutment angulation on screw loosening of implants in the anterior maxilla.
Ha CY; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 21365037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs.
Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Sadler JP; McKay ML
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Sep; 74(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 7473281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Abutments with reduced diameter for both cement and screw retentions: analysis of failure modes and misfit of abutment-crown-connections after cyclic loading.
Moris IC; Faria AC; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):432-436. PubMed ID: 26923302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Custom abutments on tilted implants in the maxilla: A clinical report.
Francesco FD; De Marco G; Sommella A; Lanza A
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2020; 17(4):314-318. PubMed ID: 33282159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of Abutment Screw Design and Crown/Implant Ratio on Preload Maintenance of Single-Crown Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses.
Rodrigues I; Zanardi P; Sesma N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1397-1403. PubMed ID: 31711081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Novel bendable abutments as a solution to correct unfavorable implant inclination. A clinical report.
Carpena ALMM; de Azevedo Kinalski M; Bergoli CD; Dos Santos MBF
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Dec; 32(8):757-762. PubMed ID: 32897646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Influence of Screw Channel Angulation on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
Garcia-Hammaker S; Saglik B; Sierraalta M; Razzoog M
J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):329-334. PubMed ID: 33170540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Esthetic and Clinical Performance of Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Crowns Made with Prefabricated or CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments: A Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial.
Wittneben JG; Gavric J; Belser UC; Bornstein MM; Joda T; Chappuis V; Sailer I; Brägger U
J Dent Res; 2017 Feb; 96(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 27927884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Full-zirconia single-tooth molar implant-supported restorations with angulated screw channel abutments: A 1-year prospective case series study.
Pol CWP; Raghoebar GM; Maragkou Z; Cune MS; Meijer HJA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):138-144. PubMed ID: 31793193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results.
Cooper LF; Stanford C; Feine J; McGuire M
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26831919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Combination of straight and tilted implants for supporting screw-retained dental prostheses in atrophic posterior maxillae: A 2-year prospective study.
Casar-Espinosa JC; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Serrera-Figallo MÁ; Garrido-Serrano R; Lynch CD; Menéndez-Collar M; Torres-Lagares D; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():85-93. PubMed ID: 28587977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Abutment margin levels and residual cement occurrence in cement-retained implant restorations: An observational study.
Kim HJ; Karasan D; Park K; Kwon HB; Han JS; Lee JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jan; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 36278423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
