209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33610451)
21. Breast Arterial Calcifications on Mammography: A Survey of Practicing Radiologists.
Collado-Mesa F; Yepes MM; Arheart K
J Breast Imaging; 2021 Aug; 3(4):438-447. PubMed ID: 38424788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists.
Gao Y; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28188043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Are radiologists' goals for mammography accuracy consistent with published recommendations?
Jackson SL; Cook AJ; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Brenner RJ; Elmore JG
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 22130089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relationship between the arterial calcification detected in mammography and coronary artery disease.
Topal U; Kaderli A; Topal NB; Ozdemir B; Yeşilbursa D; Cordan J; Ediz B; Aydinlar A
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 63(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 17344011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient and Radiologist Demographics Influence Perceptions of Screening Mammography Reports.
Grimm LJ; Knight JR; Maxfield CM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 Oct; 19(10):1088-1097. PubMed ID: 35973651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reproducibility of breast arterial calcium mass quantification using digital mammography.
Molloi S; Mehraien T; Iribarren C; Smith C; Ducote JL; Feig SA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 19201356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The correlation of SYNTAX score by coronary angiography with breast arterial calcification by digital mammography.
Ružičić D; Dobrić M; Vuković M; Hrnčić D; Đorđević S; Ružičić M; Aleksandrić S; Đorđević-Dikić A; Beleslin B
Clin Radiol; 2018 May; 73(5):454-459. PubMed ID: 29292048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast arterial calcification rates in a diverse, urban group of screening mammography patients.
Montgomery GH; Schnur JB; Erblich J; Narula J; Benck K; Margolies L
Ann Epidemiol; 2022 Nov; 75():16-20. PubMed ID: 36031094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Professional and economic factors affecting access to mammography: a crisis today, or tomorrow? Results from a national survey.
Farria DM; Schmidt ME; Monsees BS; Smith RA; Hildebolt C; Yoffie R; Monticciolo DL; Feig SA; Bassett LW
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 15973693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast Arterial Calcifications: Reporting Preferences and Impact on Screening for Coronary Artery Disease.
Zaki-Metias KM; MacLean JJ; Mergo PA; Ogunde B; Al-Hameed M; Trivax CZ
J Breast Imaging; 2021 Nov; 3(6):687-693. PubMed ID: 38424930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiologist-Patient Communication: Current Practices and Barriers to Communication in Breast Imaging.
Aminololama-Shakeri S; Soo MS; Grimm LJ; Watts MR; Poplack SP; Rapelyea J; Saphier N; Stack R; Destounis S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 May; 16(5):709-716. PubMed ID: 30580958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Coronary artery disease prediction based on breast arterial calcification in women undergoing mammography as a screening for breast cancer.
Pudil J; Steyerová P; Macová I; Zemánek D; Král A; Pad'our M; Chen Z; Daneš J; Kovárník T
Menopause; 2021 Mar; 28(7):787-791. PubMed ID: 33760780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital Mammography and Screening for Coronary Artery Disease.
Margolies L; Salvatore M; Hecht HS; Kotkin S; Yip R; Baber U; Bishay V; Narula J; Yankelevitz D; Henschke C
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 9(4):350-60. PubMed ID: 27053465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.
Kim SH; Lee EH; Jun JK; Kim YM; Chang YW; Lee JH; Kim HW; Choi EJ;
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30672161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors associated with breast screening radiologists' annual mammogram reading volume in Italy.
Morrone D; Giordano L; Artuso F; Bernardi D; Fedato C; Frigerio A; Giorgi D; Naldoni C; Saguatti G; Severi D; Taffurelli M; Terribile D; Ventura L; Bucchi L
Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 27033475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The correlation of deep learning-based CAD-RADS evaluated by coronary computed tomography angiography with breast arterial calcification on mammography.
Huang Z; Xiao J; Xie Y; Hu Y; Zhang S; Li X; Wang Z; Li Z; Wang X
Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11532. PubMed ID: 32661231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiologists' attitudes and use of mammography audit reports.
Elmore JG; Aiello Bowles EJ; Geller B; Oster NV; Carney PA; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Sickles EA; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Yankaskas BC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 20457418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The association between breast arterial calcification and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in an Australian population-based breast cancer case-control study.
Lee SC; Pirikahu S; Fritschi L; Boyle T; Schultz C; Wylie E; Stone J
Radiol Med; 2023 Apr; 128(4):426-433. PubMed ID: 36877422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast lesion shape and margin evaluation: BI-RADS based metrics understate radiologists' actual levels of agreement.
Rawashdeh M; Lewis S; Zaitoun M; Brennan P
Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():294-298. PubMed ID: 29673997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Communication Practices of Mammography Facilities and Timely Follow-up of a Screening Mammogram with a BI-RADS 0 Assessment.
Schapira MM; Barlow WE; Conant EF; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Onega T; Beaber EF; Goodrich M; McCarthy AM; Herschorn SD; Skinner CS; Harrington TO; Geller B
Acad Radiol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):1118-1127. PubMed ID: 29433892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
