These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33611241)
1. [Biological behavior of meshes used for abdominal wall surgery. Preliminary results in an animal model]. Sadava EE; Campos Arbulú AL; Maya ME; Mezzadri NA Medicina (B Aires); 2021; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 33611241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TENSIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF MESHES USED IN ABDOMINAL VENTRAL WALL DEFECTS IN RATS. Utrabo CAL; Czeczko NG; Busato CR; Montemór-Netto MR; Lipinski L; Malafaia O Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2017; 30(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 29019554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions. Biondo-Simões ML; Carvalho LB; Conceição LT; Santos KB; Schiel WA; Arantes M; Silveira TD; Magri JC; Gomes FF Acta Cir Bras; 2017 Feb; 32(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 28300876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BETWEEN PROLENE®, ULTRAPRO® AND BARD SOFT® MESHES WHICH PRESENTS THE BEST PERFORMANCE IN THE REPAIR OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL? Utrabo CAL; Czeczko NG; Busato CR; Montemór-Netto MR; Lipinski L; Malafaia O Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2021; 34(1):e1577. PubMed ID: 34133524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inflammatory reaction and tensile strength of the abdominal wall after an implant of polypropylene mesh and polypropylene/poliglecaprone mesh for abdominal wall defect treatment in rats. Biondo-Simões Mde L; Moura PA; Colla K; Tocchio AF; Morais CG; Miranda RA; Robes RR; Ioshii SO Acta Cir Bras; 2014; 29 Suppl 1():45-51. PubMed ID: 25185056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. Orenstein SB; Saberski ER; Kreutzer DL; Novitsky YW J Surg Res; 2012 Aug; 176(2):423-9. PubMed ID: 22099590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. Burger JW; Halm JA; Wijsmuller AR; ten Raa S; Jeekel J Surg Endosc; 2006 Aug; 20(8):1320-5. PubMed ID: 16865616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of mast cell modulation on early host response to implanted synthetic meshes. Orenstein SB; Saberski ER; Klueh U; Kreutzer DL; Novitsky YW Hernia; 2010 Oct; 14(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 20526725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of tissue inflammatory response, fibroplasia, and foreign body reaction between the polyglactin suture of abdominal aponeurosis in rats and the intraperitoneal implant of polypropylene, polypropylene/polyglecaprone and polyester/porcine collagen meshes. Ribeiro WG; Nascimento ACC; Ferreira LB; Marchi DD; Rego GM; Maeda CT; Silva GEB; Artigiani Neto R; Torres OJM; Pitombo MB Acta Cir Bras; 2021; 36(7):e360706. PubMed ID: 34495141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polypropylene and polypropylene/polyglecaprone (Ultrapro®) meshes in the repair of incisional hernia in rats. Utiyama EM; Rosa MB; Andres Mde P; Miranda JS; Damous SH; Birolini CA; Damous LL; Montero EF Acta Cir Bras; 2015 Jun; 30(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 26108024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of the fibroplasia and collagen expression in the abdominal wall after implant of the polypropylene mesh and polypropylene/polyglecaprone mesh in rats. Biondo-Simões Mde L; Morais CG; Tocchio AF; Miranda RA; Moura PA; Colla K; Robes RR; Ioshii SO; Tomasich FD Acta Cir Bras; 2016 May; 31(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 27275849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study between polypropylene and polypropylene/poliglecaprone meshes used in the correction of abdominal wall defect in rats. Utrabo CA; Czeczko NG; Busato CR; Montemor-Netto MR; Malafaia O; Dietz UA Acta Cir Bras; 2012 Apr; 27(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 22534804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of abdominal wall compliance with intraperitoneal onlay mesh implants in rabbits: a comparison of six different state-of-the-art meshes. Konerding MA; Chantereau P; Delventhal V; Holste JL; Ackermann M Med Eng Phys; 2012 Sep; 34(7):806-16. PubMed ID: 21992970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adhesion Prevention Efficacy of Composite Meshes Parietex Winny M; Maegel L; Grethe L; Lippmann T; Jonigk D; Schrem H; Kaltenborn A; Klempnauer J; Poehnert D Int J Med Sci; 2016; 13(12):936-941. PubMed ID: 27994499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit. Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histopathologic host response to polypropylene-based surgical mesh materials in a rat abdominal wall defect model. Huber A; Boruch AV; Nieponice A; Jiang H; Medberry C; Badylak SF J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2012 Apr; 100(3):709-17. PubMed ID: 22128072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response. Weyhe D; Schmitz I; Belyaev O; Grabs R; Müller KM; Uhl W; Zumtobel V World J Surg; 2006 Aug; 30(8):1586-91. PubMed ID: 16855805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]