These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33611301)

  • 1. COERCED STERILIZATION AS A REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS VIOLATION.
    Iemelianenko V; Alesia G; Nataliya M
    Wiad Lek; 2020; 73(12 cz 2):2902-2908. PubMed ID: 33611301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive rights violations: forced sterilization and restriction of voluntary sterilization.
    Iemelianenko VV; Gornostay AV; Ivantsova AV
    Wiad Lek; 2019; 72(12 cz 2):2536-2540. PubMed ID: 32124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DEPRIVATION OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHT OF SEX OFFENDERS: SOCIAL OPINION AND LEGISLATIVE REGULATION.
    Iemelianenko VV; Gornostay AV; Yevdokimova OV
    Wiad Lek; 2021; 74(11 cz 2):2928-2933. PubMed ID: 35029558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experiences of coercion to sterilize and forced sterilization among women living with HIV in Latin America.
    Kendall T; Albert C
    J Int AIDS Soc; 2015; 18(1):19462. PubMed ID: 25808633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings.
    Tyshchenko OI; Leiba OA; Titko IA
    Wiad Lek; 2019; 72(12 cz 2):2445-2450. PubMed ID: 32124767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coerced and forced sterilization of HIV-positive women in Namibia.
    Mallet J; Kalambi V
    HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 13(2-3):77-8. PubMed ID: 19297769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. International cooperation in criminal proceedings involving assisted reproductive technologies.
    Kuchynska O; Kashyntseva O; Tsyganyuk Y
    Wiad Lek; 2019; 72(12 cz 2):2531-2535. PubMed ID: 32124780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the samples of human biological materials in the criminal procedure: the practice of the european court of human rights.
    Kaplina OV; Shylo OH; Titko IA
    Wiad Lek; 2019 Aug; 72(8):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 32012511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forced sterilization of women as discrimination.
    Patel P
    Public Health Rev; 2017; 38():15. PubMed ID: 29450087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A national sterilization policy: no consensus, especially for the mentally incompetent.
    Hart DS
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Jun; 7(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 12260349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicine, eugenics, and the Supreme Court: from coercive sterilization to reproductive freedom.
    Lombardo PA
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9068235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forced and coerced sterilization of women in Europe.
    Zampas C; Lamačková A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 114(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 21683952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forced and coerced sterilization of Indigenous women: Strengths to build upon.
    Leason J
    Can Fam Physician; 2021 Jul; 67(7):525-527. PubMed ID: 34261716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
    Diamond E
    New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [; IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO PROTECT HEALTH ON THE MATERIALS OF THE PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS].
    Yukhno O; Yemelianov V; Pavlykivskyi V; Kalashnyk O; Sivash O
    Georgian Med News; 2020; (304-305):189-194. PubMed ID: 32965273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MENTAL HEALTH OF A PERSON AS A CRITERION OF PERSONAL PARTICIPATION IN THE TRIAL DURING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS.
    Tatsiy VY; Tyshchenko OI; Titko IA
    Wiad Lek; 2020; 73(12 cz 2):2737-2742. PubMed ID: 33611275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Global Commission on HIV and the Law: recommendations for legal reform to promote sexual and reproductive health and rights.
    El Feki S; Avafia T; Fidalgo TM; Divan V; Chauvel C; Dhaliwal M; Cortez C
    Reprod Health Matters; 2014 Nov; 22(44):125-36. PubMed ID: 25555770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Georgia Supreme Court invalidates involuntary sterilization statute.
    Harper TD
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 Nov; 72(11):795-7. PubMed ID: 6655381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DIVULGENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF ADOPTION: CRIMINAL LEGAL AND MEDICAL ASPECTS.
    Haltsova VV; Kharytonov SO; Bondarenko OO
    Wiad Lek; 2021; 74(11 cz 2):3085-3091. PubMed ID: 35029584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.