These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33611308)

  • 1. SIDE EFFECTS OF DIETHYLSTILBESTROL (DES) FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TORT LAW.
    Karnaukh BP; Shymko AR
    Wiad Lek; 2020; 73(12 cz 2):2946-2950. PubMed ID: 33611308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Theories of recovery for DES damage. Is tort liability the answer?
    Downey AH; Gulley KG
    J Leg Med; 1983 Jun; 4(2):167-200. PubMed ID: 6604118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preconception tort liability: recognizing a strict liability cause of action for DES grandchildren.
    Mascaro ML
    Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(4):435-55. PubMed ID: 1812769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tort law - loss of a chance doctrine - Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court accepts loss of a chance in medical malpractice suits. - Matsuyama v. Birnbaum, 890 N.E.2d 819 (Mass. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 Feb; 122(4):1247-54. PubMed ID: 19320069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factual causation in medical negligence.
    Manning J
    J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):337-55. PubMed ID: 18251418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causation's nuclear future: applying proportional liability to the Price-Anderson Act.
    O'Connell WD
    Duke Law J; 2014 Nov; 64(2):333-76. PubMed ID: 25423683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court Decisions on Medical Malpractice in China After the New Tort Liability Law.
    Zhang K; Li Y; Fan F; Liu X; Deng ZH
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2016 Sep; 37(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 27281443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
    Hollingsworth JG; Lasker EG
    J Health Law; 2004; 37(1):85-111. PubMed ID: 15191237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prescription for fairness: a new approach to tort liability of brand-name and generic drug manufacturers.
    Rostron A
    Duke Law J; 2011 Feb; 60(5):1123-91. PubMed ID: 21365961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compensating Pharmaceutical Injuries in the Absence of Fault.
    Rowin MA
    Food Drug Law J; 2014; 69(3):447-70, ii. PubMed ID: 27382858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Australian tort law reform: statutory principles of causation and the common law.
    Mendelson D
    J Law Med; 2004 May; 11(4):492-509. PubMed ID: 15214134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Jury holds all makers liable for DES effects.
    Med World News; 1979 Sep; 20(18):17-8. PubMed ID: 11645410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The demise of drug design litigation: death by federal preemption.
    Twerski AD
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2018; 68(1):281-304. PubMed ID: 30457769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wilson v. Kuenzi.
    Missouri. Supreme Court, en banc
    Wests South West Report; 1988 May; 751():741-9. PubMed ID: 12041300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Padova Charter on personal injury and damage under civil-tort law : Medico-legal guidelines on methods of ascertainment and criteria of evaluation.
    Ferrara SD; Baccino E; Boscolo-Berto R; Comandè G; Domenici R; Hernandez-Cueto C; Gulmen MK; Mendelson G; Montisci M; Norelli GA; Pinchi V; Ranavaya M; Shokry DA; Sterzik V; Vermylen Y; Vieira DN; Viel G; Zoja R;
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 26342285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of Wyeth v. Levine on FDA regulation of prescription drugs.
    Ausness RC
    Food Drug Law J; 2010; 65(2):247-83, i-ii. PubMed ID: 24475542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compensation for diethylstilbestrol injury.
    van Leeuwen FE; van Erp EJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Heintz PA
    Lancet; 2007 Apr; 369(9569):1258. PubMed ID: 17434397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Payton v. Abbott Laboratories: an analysis of the Massachusetts DES class action suit.
    Silbersweig SE
    Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(2):243-82. PubMed ID: 7468600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preemption of the "fraud on the FDA" exception to Michigan's tort immunity statute for drug manufacturers: reconsidering Garcia and Desiano after Levine.
    Murdey J
    Food Drug Law J; 2011; 66(1):85-104, ii-iii. PubMed ID: 24505848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impatient Patient and the Unreceptive Receptionist: Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50.
    Purshouse C
    Med Law Rev; 2019 May; 27(2):318-329. PubMed ID: 30597098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.