These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33612006)

  • 1. Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.
    Ecker UKH; Sze BKN; Andreotta M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200145. PubMed ID: 33612006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of political devotion in sharing partisan misinformation and resistance to fact-checking.
    Pretus C; Servin-Barthet C; Harris EA; Brady WJ; Vilarroya O; Van Bavel JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Nov; 152(11):3116-3134. PubMed ID: 37347911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
    Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The
    Pretus C; Javeed AM; Hughes D; Hackenburg K; Tsakiris M; Vilarroya O; Van Bavel JJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Mar; 379(1897):20230040. PubMed ID: 38244594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Efficacy of Accuracy Prompts Across Partisan Lines: An Adversarial Collaboration.
    Martel C; Rathje S; Clark CJ; Pennycook G; Van Bavel JJ; Rand DG; van der Linden S
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Apr; 35(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 38506937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. You don't have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections.
    Ecker UKH; Butler LH; Hamby A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Dec; 5(1):64. PubMed ID: 33300094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systems thinking as a pathway to global warming beliefs and attitudes through an ecological worldview.
    Ballew MT; Goldberg MH; Rosenthal SA; Gustafson A; Leiserowitz A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(17):8214-8219. PubMed ID: 30962375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do forewarnings and post-warnings affect misinformation reliance? The impact of warnings on the continued influence effect and belief regression.
    Buczel KA; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38261249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication.
    Novoa G; Echelbarger M; Gelman A; Gelman SA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Nov; 120(47):e2309361120. PubMed ID: 37956300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Updating the identity-based model of belief: From false belief to the spread of misinformation.
    Van Bavel JJ; Rathje S; Vlasceanu M; Pretus C
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101787. PubMed ID: 38295623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explaining Political Differences in Attitudes to Vaccines in France: Partisan Cues, Disenchantment with Politics and Political Sophistication.
    Ward JK; Cortaredona S; Touzet H; Gauna F; Peretti-Watel P
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38836412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. COVID-19 coverage from six network and cable news sources in the United States: Representation of misinformation, correction, and portrayals of severity.
    Maloney EK; White AJ; Samuel L; Boehm M; Bleakley A
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):58-72. PubMed ID: 37401262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using narratives to correct politically charged health misinformation and address affective belief echoes.
    Lillie HM; Ratcliff CL; King AJ; Pokharel M; Jensen JD
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38632889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Politics of the Gender Gap in COVID-19: Partisanship, Health Behavior, and Policy Preferences in the United States.
    Burton CD; Gadarian SK; Goodman SW; Pepinsky TB
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2024 Jun; 49(3):429-449. PubMed ID: 37987177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blocking of counter-partisan accounts drives political assortment on Twitter.
    Martel C; Mosleh M; Yang Q; Zaman T; Rand DG
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 May; 3(5):pgae161. PubMed ID: 38779113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction format has a limited role when debunking misinformation.
    Swire-Thompson B; Cook J; Butler LH; Sanderson JA; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Dec; 6(1):83. PubMed ID: 34964924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Party affiliation predicts homeowners' decisions to install solar PV, but partisan gap wanes with improved economics of solar.
    Dokshin FA; Gherghina M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Jul; 121(29):e2303519121. PubMed ID: 38976726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses to political partisans are shaped by a COVID-19-sensitive disease avoidance psychology: A longitudinal investigation of functional flexibility.
    Ko A; Neuberg SL; Pick CM; Varnum MEW; Becker DV
    Am Psychol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38546601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using "balanced pragmatism" in political discussions increases cross-partisan respect.
    Puryear C; Gray K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 May; 153(5):1189-1212. PubMed ID: 38451700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. People believe political opponents accept blatant moral wrongs, fueling partisan divides.
    Puryear C; Kubin E; Schein C; Bigman YE; Ekstrom P; Gray K
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 Jul; 3(7):pgae244. PubMed ID: 39015548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.