315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33612308)
1. Shrinkage stress and cuspal deflection in MOD restorations: analytical solutions and design guidelines.
Aregawi WA; Fok ASL
Dent Mater; 2021 May; 37(5):783-795. PubMed ID: 33612308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
Kim ME; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cuspal flexure of teeth with composite restorations subjected to occlusal loading.
González-López S; Vilchez Díaz MA; de Haro-Gasquet F; Ceballos L; de Haro-Muñoz C
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17432396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Restorative Protocol on Cuspal Strain and Residual Stress in Endodontically Treated Molars.
Pereira R; Bicalho AA; Franco SD; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 26237644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites.
Kwon Y; Ferracane J; Lee IB
Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):801-9. PubMed ID: 22575738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values.
Fleming GJ; Hall DP; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15683895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
Bicalho AA; de Souza SJ; de Rosatto CM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques.
Campodonico CE; Tantbirojn D; Olin PS; Versluis A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Oct; 142(10):1176-82. PubMed ID: 21965491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites.
Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Nathwani H; Burke FJ; Randall RC
Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 15766579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
