These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33612384)

  • 1. Matching Behaviours and Rewards.
    Houston AI; Trimmer PC; McNamara JM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 25(5):403-415. PubMed ID: 33612384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect?
    Green L; Myerson J; Holt DD; Slevin JR; Estle SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 15113132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 26301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Like chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), pigeons (Columba livia domestica) match and Nash equilibrate where humans (Homo sapiens) do not.
    Hachiga Y; Schwartz LP; Tripoli C; Michaels S; Kearns D; Silberberg A
    J Comp Psychol; 2019 May; 133(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 30372107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentuation of the differential outcomes effect by extraneous reward.
    White KG; Millar JG
    Behav Processes; 2014 Oct; 108():7-10. PubMed ID: 25219548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for a magnitude effect in temporal discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; Sargisson RJ; White KG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 22229590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: 'jackpot' signals promote maladaptive risky choice.
    Smith AP; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6625. PubMed ID: 28747679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural architecture of choice behaviour in a concurrent interval schedule.
    Kalenscher T; Diekamp B; Güntürkün O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 18(9):2627-37. PubMed ID: 14622165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High monetary reward rates and caloric rewards decrease temporal persistence.
    Fung BJ; Bode S; Murawski C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Feb; 284(1849):. PubMed ID: 28228517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early commitment facilitates optimal choice by pigeons.
    Zentall TR; Case JP; Berry JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):957-963. PubMed ID: 27743217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal decision making and matching are tied through diminishing returns.
    Kubanek J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Aug; 114(32):8499-8504. PubMed ID: 28739920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamics of pre- and post-choice behaviour: rats approximate optimal strategy in a discrete-trial decision task.
    Fam J; Westbrook F; Arabzadeh E
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Mar; 282(1803):20142963. PubMed ID: 25694623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON.
    GRAF V; BULLOCK DH; BITTERMAN ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Mar; 7(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 14130091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Teaching pigeons to commit base-rate neglect.
    Fantino E; Kanevsky IG; Charlton SR
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):820-5. PubMed ID: 16181446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The paradoxical effect of low reward probabilities in suboptimal choice.
    Fortes I; Pinto C; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):180-193. PubMed ID: 29683696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When animals misbehave: analogs of human biases and suboptimal choice.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():3-13. PubMed ID: 25192737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suboptimal choice: A review and quantification of the signal for good news (SiGN) model.
    Dunn RM; Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Spetch ML
    Psychol Rev; 2024 Jan; 131(1):58-78. PubMed ID: 36877476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Summation of symbols by pigeons (Columba livia): the importance of number and mass of reward items.
    Olthof A; Roberts WA
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Jun; 114(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 10890587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delayed matching-to-sample: A tool to assess memory and other cognitive processes in pigeons.
    Zentall TR; Smith AP
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():26-42. PubMed ID: 26165174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the relationship between differential outcomes and differential sample responding in matching-to-sample.
    Urcuioli PJ; DeMarse T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jul; 20(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 8046356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.