169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33614001)
1. Courtship behavior, nesting microhabitat, and assortative mating in sympatric stickleback species pairs.
Dean LL; Dunstan HR; Reddish A; MacColl ADC
Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(4):1741-1755. PubMed ID: 33614001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive assortative mating between recently described sympatric morphs of Icelandic sticklebacks.
Olafsdóttir GA; Ritchie MG; Snorrason SS
Biol Lett; 2006 Jun; 2(2):250-2. PubMed ID: 17148375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does paternal care influence mate preference? Male and female mating behavior in Threespine Stickleback ecotypes that differ markedly in parental care.
Corney RH; Weir LK
Ecol Evol; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e9953. PubMed ID: 36998604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flexible mate choice may contribute to ecotype assortative mating in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus).
Jarvis WMC; Comeau SM; Colborne SF; Robinson BW
J Evol Biol; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1810-1820. PubMed ID: 28590579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.
Bay RA; Arnegard ME; Conte GL; Best J; Bedford NL; McCann SR; Dubin ME; Chan YF; Jones FC; Kingsley DM; Schluter D; Peichel CL
Curr Biol; 2017 Nov; 27(21):3344-3349.e4. PubMed ID: 29056455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assortative mating by diet in a phenotypically unimodal but ecologically variable population of stickleback.
Snowberg LK; Bolnick DI
Am Nat; 2008 Nov; 172(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 18834291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual isolation promotes divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback.
Berner D; Ammann M; Spencer E; Rüegg A; Lüscher D; Moser D
J Evol Biol; 2017 Feb; 30(2):401-411. PubMed ID: 27862535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior.
Yang Y; Blomenkamp S; Dugas MB; Richards-Zawacki CL; Pröhl H
Am Nat; 2019 Apr; 193(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 30912970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?
Albert AY; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15212390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
Conte GL; Schluter D
Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
McKinnon JS; Hamele N; Frey N; Chou J; McAleavey L; Greene J; Paulson W
PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e37951. PubMed ID: 22701589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assortative mating among Lake Malawi cichlid fish populations is not simply predictable from male nuptial colour.
Blais J; Plenderleith M; Rico C; Taylor MI; Seehausen O; van Oosterhout C; Turner GF
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Mar; 9():53. PubMed ID: 19265521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence.
Sefc KM; Hermann CM; Steinwender B; Brindl H; Zimmermann H; Mattersdorfer K; Postl L; Makasa L; Sturmbauer C; Koblmüller S
Ecol Evol; 2015 Apr; 5(8):1549-62. PubMed ID: 25937900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Admixture between Ancient Lineages, Selection, and the Formation of Sympatric Stickleback Species-Pairs.
Dean LL; Magalhaes IS; Foote A; D'Agostino D; McGowan S; MacColl ADC
Mol Biol Evol; 2019 Nov; 36(11):2481-2497. PubMed ID: 31297536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No evidence for size-assortative mating in the wild despite mutual mate choice in sex-role-reversed pipefishes.
Mobley KB; Abou Chakra M; Jones AG
Ecol Evol; 2014 Jan; 4(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 24455162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Male courtship preferences demonstrate discrimination against allopatric colour morphs in a cichlid fish.
Zoppoth P; Koblmüller S; Sefc KM
J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 23405907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.
Head ML; Kozak GM; Boughman JW
Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2183-96. PubMed ID: 23919161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
