206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33614427)
1. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification system using 3-dimensional printed solid models.
Keltz E; Keshet D; Peled E; Zvi Y; Norman D; Keren Y
World J Orthop; 2021 Feb; 12(2):82-93. PubMed ID: 33614427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?
Brouwers L; Pull Ter Gunne AF; de Jongh MA; Maal TJJ; Vreeken R; van der Heijden FHWM; Leenen LPH; Spanjersberg WR; van Helden SH; Verbeek DO; Bemelman M; Lansink KWW
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 31531739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Column Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Introduction and Reproducibility Assessment.
Zhang R; Yin Y; Li A; Wang Z; Hou Z; Zhuang Y; Fan S; Wu Z; Yi C; Lyu G; Ma X; Zhang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Nov; 101(22):2015-2025. PubMed ID: 31764364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Matta JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 12954828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?
Ohashi K; El-Khoury GY; Abu-Zahra KW; Berbaum KS
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 17005769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study.
Tazeabadi SA; Noroozi SG; Salehzadeh M; Bahardoust M; Farahini H; Hajializade M; Yeganeh A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):405. PubMed ID: 32590966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum.
Petrisor BA; Bhandari M; Orr RD; Mandel S; Kwok DC; Schemitsch EH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 12720013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new classification for quadrilateral plate fracture of acetabulum.
Chen K; Yao S; Yin Y; Wan Y; Ahn J; Zhu S; Chen H; Fan S; Guo S; Yi C; Li L; Hou Z; Guo X
Injury; 2023 Jul; 54(7):110762. PubMed ID: 37164901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do 3-D Printed Handheld Models Improve Surgeon Reliability for Recognition of Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture Characteristics?
Langerhuizen DWG; Doornberg JN; Janssen MMA; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Jaarsma RL; Janssen SJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 478(12):2901-2908. PubMed ID: 32667759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures.
Spek RWA; Schoolmeesters BJA; Oosterhoff JHF; Doornberg JN; van den Bekerom MPJ; Jaarsma RL; Eygendaal D; IJpma F;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 34427569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous?
Clarke-Jenssen J; Øvre SA; Røise O; Madsen JE
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jul; 135(7):913-8. PubMed ID: 25931251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are 3D-printed Models of Tibial Plateau Fractures a Useful Addition to Understanding Fractures for Junior Surgeons?
Huitema JM; van der Gaast N; Brouwers L; Jaarsma RL; Doornberg JN; Edwards MJR; Hermans E;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1170-1177. PubMed ID: 35230277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Application of three-dimensional printing personalized acetabular wing-plate in treatment of complex acetabular fractures via lateral-rectus approach].
Mai JG; Gu C; Lin XZ; Li T; Huang WQ; Wang H; Tan XY; Lin H; Wang YM; Yang YQ; Jin DD; Fan SC
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 55(3):172-178. PubMed ID: 28241717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. There Is No Column: A New Classification for Acetabular Fractures.
Herman A; Tenenbaum S; Ougortsin V; Shazar N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(2):e8. PubMed ID: 29342067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehension and reproducibility of the Judet and Letournel classification.
Polesello GC; Nunes MA; Azuaga TL; de Queiroz MC; Honda EK; Ono NK
Acta Ortop Bras; 2012; 20(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 24453583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ongoing relevance of acetabular fracture classification.
Hutt JR; Ortega-Briones A; Daurka JS; Bircher MD; Rickman MS
Bone Joint J; 2015 Aug; 97-B(8):1139-43. PubMed ID: 26224834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?
Meesters AML; Ten Duis K; Banierink H; Stirler VMA; Wouters PCR; Kraeima J; de Vries JPM; Witjes MJH; IJpma FFA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 478(12):2801-2808. PubMed ID: 32769535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel approach using 3-D printing in the Irish National Centre for pelvic and acetabular surgery.
Downey C; McCarrick C; Fenelon C; Murphy EP; O'Daly BJ; Leonard M
Ir J Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 189(1):219-228. PubMed ID: 31280418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures.
Hurson C; Tansey A; O'Donnchadha B; Nicholson P; Rice J; McElwain J
Injury; 2007 Oct; 38(10):1158-62. PubMed ID: 17884058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT.
Bruinsma WE; Guitton TG; Warner JJ; Ring D;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
