These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33614427)
1. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification system using 3-dimensional printed solid models. Keltz E; Keshet D; Peled E; Zvi Y; Norman D; Keren Y World J Orthop; 2021 Feb; 12(2):82-93. PubMed ID: 33614427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures? Brouwers L; Pull Ter Gunne AF; de Jongh MA; Maal TJJ; Vreeken R; van der Heijden FHWM; Leenen LPH; Spanjersberg WR; van Helden SH; Verbeek DO; Bemelman M; Lansink KWW Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 31531739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Column Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Introduction and Reproducibility Assessment. Zhang R; Yin Y; Li A; Wang Z; Hou Z; Zhuang Y; Fan S; Wu Z; Yi C; Lyu G; Ma X; Zhang Y J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Nov; 101(22):2015-2025. PubMed ID: 31764364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION. Yucens M; Aydemir AN; Demirkan AF Acta Ortop Bras; 2024; 32(1):e267640. PubMed ID: 38532863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Matta JM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 12954828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary? Ohashi K; El-Khoury GY; Abu-Zahra KW; Berbaum KS Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 17005769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study. Tazeabadi SA; Noroozi SG; Salehzadeh M; Bahardoust M; Farahini H; Hajializade M; Yeganeh A BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):405. PubMed ID: 32590966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum. Petrisor BA; Bhandari M; Orr RD; Mandel S; Kwok DC; Schemitsch EH Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 12720013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new classification for quadrilateral plate fracture of acetabulum. Chen K; Yao S; Yin Y; Wan Y; Ahn J; Zhu S; Chen H; Fan S; Guo S; Yi C; Li L; Hou Z; Guo X Injury; 2023 Jul; 54(7):110762. PubMed ID: 37164901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures. Spek RWA; Schoolmeesters BJA; Oosterhoff JHF; Doornberg JN; van den Bekerom MPJ; Jaarsma RL; Eygendaal D; IJpma F; Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 34427569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous? Clarke-Jenssen J; Øvre SA; Røise O; Madsen JE Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jul; 135(7):913-8. PubMed ID: 25931251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are 3D-printed Models of Tibial Plateau Fractures a Useful Addition to Understanding Fractures for Junior Surgeons? Huitema JM; van der Gaast N; Brouwers L; Jaarsma RL; Doornberg JN; Edwards MJR; Hermans E; Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1170-1177. PubMed ID: 35230277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Application of three-dimensional printing personalized acetabular wing-plate in treatment of complex acetabular fractures via lateral-rectus approach]. Mai JG; Gu C; Lin XZ; Li T; Huang WQ; Wang H; Tan XY; Lin H; Wang YM; Yang YQ; Jin DD; Fan SC Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 55(3):172-178. PubMed ID: 28241717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. There Is No Column: A New Classification for Acetabular Fractures. Herman A; Tenenbaum S; Ougortsin V; Shazar N J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(2):e8. PubMed ID: 29342067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehension and reproducibility of the Judet and Letournel classification. Polesello GC; Nunes MA; Azuaga TL; de Queiroz MC; Honda EK; Ono NK Acta Ortop Bras; 2012; 20(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 24453583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ongoing relevance of acetabular fracture classification. Hutt JR; Ortega-Briones A; Daurka JS; Bircher MD; Rickman MS Bone Joint J; 2015 Aug; 97-B(8):1139-43. PubMed ID: 26224834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures? Meesters AML; Ten Duis K; Banierink H; Stirler VMA; Wouters PCR; Kraeima J; de Vries JPM; Witjes MJH; IJpma FFA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 478(12):2801-2808. PubMed ID: 32769535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel approach using 3-D printing in the Irish National Centre for pelvic and acetabular surgery. Downey C; McCarrick C; Fenelon C; Murphy EP; O'Daly BJ; Leonard M Ir J Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 189(1):219-228. PubMed ID: 31280418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures. Hurson C; Tansey A; O'Donnchadha B; Nicholson P; Rice J; McElwain J Injury; 2007 Oct; 38(10):1158-62. PubMed ID: 17884058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]