These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33614427)
21. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT. Bruinsma WE; Guitton TG; Warner JJ; Ring D; J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: inter-observer reliability and agreement across imaging modalities and experience. Foroohar A; Tosti R; Richmond JM; Gaughan JP; Ilyas AM J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Jul; 6():38. PubMed ID: 21801370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of 3-dimensional printed models in the management of the distal radius fractures. Grinčuk A; Makulavičius A; Porvaneckas N; Ryliškis S; Šatkauskas I; Uvarovas V Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2023 Jan; 57(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 36939364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does semi-automatic bone-fragment segmentation improve the reproducibility of the Letournel acetabular fracture classification? Boudissa M; Orfeuvre B; Chabanas M; Tonetti J Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):633-638. PubMed ID: 28428032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Relevance of the Judet and Letournel Acetabular Fracture Classification System in the Modern Era: A Review. Butler BA; Lawton CD; Hashmi SZ; Stover MD J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Feb; 33 Suppl 2():S3-S7. PubMed ID: 30688852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of the classification of surgically treated acetabular fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Albrektsson M; Wolf O; Enocson A; Sundfeldt M Injury; 2022 Jun; 53(6):2145-2149. PubMed ID: 35287965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The value of specific radiological features in the classification of acetabular fractures. Patel V; Day A; Dinah F; Kelly M; Bircher M J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 17259420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of 3D Printed Models in Resident Education for the Classification of Acetabulum Fractures. Lim PK; Stephenson GS; Keown TW; Byrne C; Lin CC; Marecek GS; Scolaro JA J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1679-1684. PubMed ID: 29929817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [CT-based classification aid for acetabular fractures: evaluation and clinical testing]. Schäffler A; Fensky F; Knöschke D; Haas NP; Becken AG; Stöckle U; König B Unfallchirurg; 2013 Nov; 116(11):1006-14. PubMed ID: 23949195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Advanced quantitative 3D imaging improves the reliability of the classification of acetabular defects. Meynen A; Vles G; Roussot M; Van Eemeren A; Wafa H; Mulier M; Scheys L Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1611-1617. PubMed ID: 35149888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing techniques for the surgical management of acetabular fractures. Hsu CL; Chou YC; Li YT; Chen JE; Hung CC; Wu CC; Shen HC; Yeh TT Int Orthop; 2019 Aug; 43(8):1969-1976. PubMed ID: 30128670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acetabular fractures: what radiologists should know and how 3D CT can aid classification. Scheinfeld MH; Dym AA; Spektor M; Avery LL; Dym RJ; Amanatullah DF Radiographics; 2015; 35(2):555-77. PubMed ID: 25763739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Value of 3-D CT in classifying acetabular fractures during orthopedic residency training. Garrett J; Halvorson J; Carroll E; Webb LX Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e615-20. PubMed ID: 22588400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of three-dimensionally printed models for the classification of proximal humeral fractures. Bougher H; Buttner P; Smith J; Banks J; Na HS; Forrestal D; Heal C JSES Int; 2021 Mar; 5(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 33681838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is "Transcolumnar" a better Terminology than "Transverse" in Judet-Letournel Classification of Acetabular Fractures? Sood A Malays Orthop J; 2021 Jul; 15(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 34429816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures. Dust T; Hartel MJ; Henneberg JE; Korthaus A; Ballhause TM; Keller J; Ohlmeier M; Maas KJ; Frosch KH; Krause M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2023 Feb; 49(1):189-199. PubMed ID: 35941251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of morphological Mutch classification for greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: A comparison of x-ray, two-, and three-dimensional CT imaging. Razaeian S; Askittou S; Wiese B; Zhang D; Harb A; Krettek C; Hawi N PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259646. PubMed ID: 34762694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inter- and intra-observer agreement using the new AOSpine sacral fracture classification, with a comparison between spine and pelvic trauma surgeons. Meissner-Haecker A; Diaz-Ledezma C; Klaber I; Zamora T; Valencia M; Camino-Willhuber G; Astur N; Yurac R; Valacco M; Urrutia J Injury; 2022 Feb; 53(2):514-518. PubMed ID: 34991863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Association of femoral head and acetabular fractures on computerized tomography: correlation with the Judet-Letournel classification. Beckmann NM; Chinapuvvula NR; Cai C Emerg Radiol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):531-539. PubMed ID: 28424914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of two- and three-dimensional computed tomography use on intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of pilon fracture classification and treatment recommendation. Byun SE; Choi W; Choi Y; Ahn TK; Kim HK; Yoon S; Lee J; Choi DS Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1407-1412. PubMed ID: 31542310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]