BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33615533)

  • 1. Correcting the bias of the net benefit estimator due to right-censored observations.
    Péron J; Idlhaj M; Maucort-Boulch D; Giai J; Roy P; Collette L; Buyse M; Ozenne B
    Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):893-906. PubMed ID: 33615533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An extension of generalized pairwise comparisons for prioritized outcomes in the presence of censoring.
    Péron J; Buyse M; Ozenne B; Roche L; Roy P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1230-1239. PubMed ID: 27487842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The net benefit for time-to-event outcome in oncology clinical trials with treatment switching.
    Fukuda M; Sakamaki K; Oba K
    Clin Trials; 2023 Dec; 20(6):670-680. PubMed ID: 37455538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generalized pairwise comparisons for censored data: An overview.
    Deltuvaite-Thomas V; Verbeeck J; Burzykowski T; Buyse M; Tournigand C; Molenberghs G; Thas O
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100354. PubMed ID: 36127290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new measure of treatment effect in clinical trials involving competing risks based on generalized pairwise comparisons.
    Cantagallo E; De Backer M; Kicinski M; Ozenne B; Collette L; Legrand C; Buyse M; Péron J
    Biom J; 2021 Feb; 63(2):272-288. PubMed ID: 32939818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
    Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of correlations between prioritized outcomes on the net benefit and its estimate by generalized pairwise comparisons.
    Fuyama K; Ogawa M; Mizusawa J; Kanemitsu Y; Fujita S; Kawahara T; Sakamaki K; Oba K
    Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(10):1606-1624. PubMed ID: 36849124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Net benefit in the presence of correlated prioritized outcomes using generalized pairwise comparisons: A simulation study.
    Giai J; Maucort-Boulch D; Ozenne B; Chiêm JC; Buyse M; Péron J
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(3):553-565. PubMed ID: 33140505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restricted Net Treatment Benefit in oncology.
    Piffoux M; Ozenne B; De Backer M; Buyse M; Chiem JC; Péron J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 170():111340. PubMed ID: 38570079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjusting win statistics for dependent censoring.
    Dong G; Huang B; Wang D; Verbeeck J; Wang J; Hoaglin DC
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):440-450. PubMed ID: 33247544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The asymptotic distribution of the Net Benefit estimator in presence of right-censoring.
    Ozenne B; Budtz-Jørgensen E; Péron J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2399-2412. PubMed ID: 34633267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: a simulation study investigating the use of inverse probability weighting instead of re-censoring.
    Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Siebert U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):69. PubMed ID: 30935369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the use of extreme value tail modeling for generalized pairwise comparisons with censored outcomes.
    De Backer M; Legrand C; Péron J; Lambert A; Buyse M
    Pharm Stat; 2023 Mar; 22(2):284-299. PubMed ID: 36321470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Operational characteristics of generalized pairwise comparisons for hierarchically ordered endpoints.
    Deltuvaite-Thomas V; Burzykowski T
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 21(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 34346169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restricted mean survival time for interval-censored data.
    Zhang C; Wu Y; Yin G
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(26):3879-3895. PubMed ID: 32767503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fair comparisons of cause-specific and relative survival by accounting for the systematic removal of patients from risk-sets.
    Wells M; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 86():102408. PubMed ID: 37591148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Net Chance of a Longer Survival as a Patient-Oriented Measure of Treatment Benefit in Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Péron J; Roy P; Ozenne B; Roche L; Buyse M
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):901-5. PubMed ID: 27124210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regression models for interval censored data using parametric pseudo-observations.
    Johansen MN; Lundbye-Christensen S; Larsen JM; Parner ET
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):36. PubMed ID: 33588771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring.
    Dong G; Mao L; Huang B; Gamalo-Siebers M; Wang J; Yu G; Hoaglin DC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):882-899. PubMed ID: 32552451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous marginal survival estimators when doubly censored data is present.
    Julià O; Gómez G
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2011 Jul; 17(3):347-72. PubMed ID: 20886370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.