These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33616579)

  • 1. Comparison of the Retention of Conventional and Polyvinyl Siloxane Matrix Materials with Different Patrices for Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Yılmaz E; Gencel B; Geckili O; Sakar O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):311–318. PubMed ID: 33616579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of denture cleaning solutions on the retention of Hader bar clips.
    Küçükekenci AS; Dede DÖ; Çelik E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):350.e1-350.e6. PubMed ID: 33198989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of implant angulation and patrice on the retention of overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro study.
    Frantz K; Funkenbusch P; Feng C; Tsigarida A; Chochlidakis K; Lo Russo L; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):452-459. PubMed ID: 37212388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention force and allowable range of the angle of an implant-supported overdenture attachment system using healing screws and a silicone resilient denture liner.
    Koike T; Kubo K; Kono T; Ueda T; Sakurai K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):630-634. PubMed ID: 31383531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Elhaddad AA; Khirallah AS
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):568-576. PubMed ID: 27589487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Different Bar Designs on Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 30695085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro changes in clips and bars used to retain implant overdentures.
    Walton JN; Ruse ND
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8809253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures.
    Valente MLC; Shimano MVW; Agnelli JAM; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29961625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overdenture retention of four resilient liners over an implant bar.
    Kiat-Amnuay S; Khan Z; Gettleman L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 10220661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture.
    Nassar HI; Abdelaziz MS
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):227. PubMed ID: 35681163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.