These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33616716)

  • 1. Facial Contour Refining after Surgery-First SSRO with Computer-Assisted Design in East Asians.
    Lai C; Song G; Zong X; Jin X
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Aug; 45(4):1564-1572. PubMed ID: 33616716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Application of 3D Printing Technology for Simultaneous Orthognathic Surgery and Mandibular Contour Osteoplasty in the Treatment of Craniofacial Deformities.
    Xiao Y; Sun X; Wang L; Zhang Y; Chen K; Wu G
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(6):1413-1424. PubMed ID: 28639069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
    Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
    Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Wong NSM; Leung YY
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
    Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bimaxillary Orthognathic Approach to Correct Skeletal Facial Asymmetry of Hemifacial Microsomia in Adults.
    Luo E; Yang S; Du W; Chen Q; Liao C; Fei W; Hu J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 40(3):400-9. PubMed ID: 26908014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined Use of Facial Osteoplasty and Orthognathic Surgery for Treatment of Dentofacial Deformities.
    Li Y; Hu Z; Ye B; Liu Y; Ren X; Zhu S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 74(12):2505.e1-2505.e12. PubMed ID: 27677685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphological Changes of the Mandibular Angle After Orthognathic Surgery with Class III Deformity in East Asia.
    Gao H; Bi D; Al-Watary MQH; Song L; Sun X; Zhao Q; Li J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Mar; 48(5):816-826. PubMed ID: 37758853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
    Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
    Tabrizi R; Pakshir H; Behnia H; Akhlaghi S; Shahsavari N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk Factors Analysis for Different Types of Unfavorable Fracture Patterns During Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Retrospective Study of 2008 Sides.
    Wang M; Li P; Zhang J; Sun Y; Zhang X; Jiang N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Oct; 46(5):2348-2355. PubMed ID: 34984494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tongue-palatal contact changes in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an electropalatography study.
    Kojima S; Kaku M; Yamamoto I; Yasuhara Y; Sumi H; Yamamoto T; Yashima Y; Izumino J; Nakajima K; Nagano Y; Kono M; Yoshimura A; Ueasa M; Tanimoto K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 44(9):673-682. PubMed ID: 28581686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.
    Han JJ; Yang HJ; Lee SJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 24411469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on stress distribution of temporomandibular joints in patients with mandibular prognathism under symmetric occlusions.
    Ma H; Shu J; Wang Q; Teng H; Liu Z
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Dec; 23(16):1297-1305. PubMed ID: 32696672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in border movement of the mandible in skeletal Class III before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Nakano Y; Higuchi M; Nakazawa R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 43(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 23953770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetric mandibular prognathism: outcome, stability and patient satisfaction after BSSO surgery. A retrospective study.
    Hågensli N; Stenvik A; Espeland L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1735-41. PubMed ID: 25175078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
    Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
    Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
    Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.