These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33617152)

  • 1. Comparison of Wear Resistance of Prefabricated Composite Veneers Versus Ceramic and Enamel.
    Dederichs M; Fahmy MD; An H; Guentsch A; Viebranz S; Kuepper H
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):711-719. PubMed ID: 33617152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear pattern-associated color stability of prefabricated composite veneers versus ceramic veneers.
    Dederichs M; Viebranz S; An H; Guentsch A; Kuepper H
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):646-652. PubMed ID: 36301225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Wear intensity and surface roughness of microhybrid composite and ceramic occlusal veneers on premolars after the thermocycling and cyclic mechanical loading tests].
    Zhang HY; Jiang T; Cheng MX; Zhang YW
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 29483726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Fracture Load and Surface Wear of Microhybrid Composite and Ceramic Occlusal Veneers.
    Zhang H; Lv P; Du W; Jiang T
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jun; 29(5):387-393. PubMed ID: 32125065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate.
    Kwon SJ; Lawson NC; McLaren EE; Nejat AH; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 29310875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing.
    Lawson NC; Janyavula S; Syklawer S; McLaren EA; Burgess JO
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1586-91. PubMed ID: 25257823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials.
    Matzinger M; Hahnel S; Preis V; Rosentritt M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):725-737. PubMed ID: 29770877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials exhibit load-bearing capacities not different from conventional restorations.
    Ioannidis A; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():433-440. PubMed ID: 30447557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of simulated toothbrushing on surface properties of chairside CAD-CAM materials: An in vitro study.
    de Andrade GS; Augusto MG; Simões BV; Pagani C; Saavedra GSFA; Bresciani E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):469.e1-469.e6. PubMed ID: 33279154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; De Angelis F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 26553254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of acidic pH on surface roughness of esthetic dental materials.
    Alnasser M; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Suzuki M; Ghaffari R; Ali A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):567.e1-567.e8. PubMed ID: 31699448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Kateeb E; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24836531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations.
    Braga RR; Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of tooth brush abrasion and thermo-mechanical loading on direct and indirect veneer restorations.
    Rosentritt M; Sawaljanow A; Behr M; Kolbeck C; Preis V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jan; 19(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24578230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Surface Roughness and Wear of Machinable Ceramics and Opposing Dental Enamel.
    Daryakenari G; Alaghehmand H; Bijani A
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 30142040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials.
    Clelland NL; Agarwala V; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Mar; 10(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11406790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear Characteristics and Volume Loss of CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials.
    Zurek AD; Alfaro MF; Wee AG; Yuan JC; Barao VA; Mathew MT; Sukotjo C
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e510-e518. PubMed ID: 29508487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement shrinkage under zirconia versus lithium disilicate veneers.
    Hsu P; Ramos V; Sadr A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 32204930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.