434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33617796)
1. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
Haas DM; Daggy J; Flannery KM; Dorr ML; Bonsack C; Bhamidipalli SS; Pierson RC; Lathrop A; Towns R; Ngo N; Head A; Morgan S; Quinney SK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):259.e1-259.e16. PubMed ID: 31075246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez Slagle HB; Fonge YN; Caplan R; Pfeuti CK; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 226(5):724.e1-724.e9. PubMed ID: 35135684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Combined with a Foley Catheter among Individuals with Obesity Undergoing Induction.
Gomez Slagle HB; Kawakita T; Hoffman MK; Sciscione AC; Ma'ayeh M
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38631390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Levine LD; Downes KL; Elovitz MA; Parry S; Sammel MD; Srinivas SK
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1357-1364. PubMed ID: 27824758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Al-Ibraheemi Z; Brustman L; Bimson BE; Porat N; Rosenn B
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 29215514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Foley Catheter or Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Women with Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Multicenter Trial.
Kruit H; Tihtonen K; Raudaskoski T; Ulander VM; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Heikinheimo O; Paavonen J; Rahkonen L
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):866-72. PubMed ID: 27031055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction.
El-Khayat W; Alelaiw H; El-kateb A; Elsemary A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 25694257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature.
Jozwiak M; ten Eikelder M; Oude Rengerink K; de Groot C; Feitsma H; Spaanderman M; van Pampus M; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp K;
Am J Perinatol; 2014 Feb; 31(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 23564065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.
Bracken H; Mundle S; Faragher B; Easterling T; Haycox A; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Sep; 14():308. PubMed ID: 25193157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.
Lee HH; Huang BS; Cheng M; Yeh CC; Lin IC; Horng HC; Huang HY; Lee WL; Wang PH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32168947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
