These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3361872)

  • 1. Detection of the fetal ECG during labour by an intrauterine probe.
    Randall NJ; Steer PJ; Sutherland IA
    J Biomed Eng; 1988 Apr; 10(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3361872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of in utero telemetric fetal ECG monitoring in a lamb model.
    Hermans B; Lewi L; Jani J; De Buck F; Deprest J; Puers R
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 18648203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings.
    Graatsma EM; Jacod BC; van Egmond LA; Mulder EJ; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):334-7; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19076966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heart rate detection in low amplitude non-invasive fetal ECG recordings.
    Peters C; Vullings R; Bergmans J; Oei G; Wijn P
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6092-4. PubMed ID: 17946740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suitability of fetal scalp electrodes for monitoring the fetal electrocardiogram during labour.
    Westgate J; Keith RD; Curnow JS; Ifeachor EC; Greene KR
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1990 Nov; 11(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 2279371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
    Vullings R; Peters CH; Sluijter RJ; Mischi M; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of non-invasive Foetal electrocardiography in a twin pregnancy.
    Noben L; Westerhuis MEMH; van Laar JOEH; Kok RD; Oei SG; Peters CHL; Vullings R
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Apr; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 32293330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-invasive intrapartum fetal ECG: preliminary report.
    Taylor MJ; Thomas MJ; Smith MJ; Oseku-Afful S; Fisk NM; Green AR; Paterson-Brown S; Gardiner HM
    BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1016-21. PubMed ID: 16045511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linear Phase Sharp Transition BPF to Detect Noninvasive Maternal and Fetal Heart Rate.
    Marchon N; Naik G; Pai KR
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():5485728. PubMed ID: 29796231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann W; Herrmann E; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 22714064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel modular fetal ECG STAN and HRV analysis: Towards robust hypoxia detection.
    Martinek R; Kahankova R; Martin B; Nedoma J; Fajkus M
    Technol Health Care; 2019; 27(3):257-287. PubMed ID: 30562910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal ECG during labour: a presentation of a microprocessor system.
    Lilja H; Arulkumaran S; Lindecrantz K; Ratnam SS; Rosén KG
    J Biomed Eng; 1988 Jul; 10(4):348-50. PubMed ID: 3236855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nonpenetrating fetal scalp electrode.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Nikodem VC; Gülmezoĝlu AM; Bunn AE
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jul; 100(7):649-52. PubMed ID: 8369248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Fetal monitoring with a combination transducer for FHR and uterine contraction--production of the transducer].
    Maeda K; Nagata N
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 41(1):91-2. PubMed ID: 2926198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative accuracy of computerized intrapartum fetal heart rate pattern recognition by ultrasound and abdominal electrocardiogram detection.
    Hayes-Gill BR; Martin TRP; Liu C; Cohen WR
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):413-422. PubMed ID: 31792930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrapartum non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring: A prospective observational study.
    Lempersz C; Noben L; van Osta G; Wassen MLH; Meershoek BPJ; Bakker P; Jacquemyn Y; Cuerva MJ; Vullings R; Westerhuis MEMH; Oei GS
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Oct; 99(10):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 32306380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of signal loss on the comparison between computer analyses of the fetal heart rate in labour using pulsed Doppler ultrasound (with autocorrelation) and simultaneous scalp electrocardiogram.
    Spencer JA; Belcher R; Dawes GS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 May; 25(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3297840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Telefetalcare: a first prototype of a wearable fetal electrocardiograph.
    Fanelli A; Signorini MG; Ferrario M; Perego P; Piccini L; Andreoni G; Magenes G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6899-902. PubMed ID: 22255924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal electrocardiograms, direct and abdominal with reference heartbeat annotations.
    Matonia A; Jezewski J; Kupka T; Jezewski M; Horoba K; Wrobel J; Czabanski R; Kahankowa R
    Sci Data; 2020 Jun; 7(1):200. PubMed ID: 32587253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The continuous measurement of tissue pH in the human fetus during labour using a new application technique.
    Flynn AM; Kelly J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Aug; 87(8):666-8. PubMed ID: 7426526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.