503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33618777)
1. CADD-Splice-improving genome-wide variant effect prediction using deep learning-derived splice scores.
Rentzsch P; Schubach M; Shendure J; Kircher M
Genome Med; 2021 Feb; 13(1):31. PubMed ID: 33618777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays.
Smith C; Kitzman JO
Genome Biol; 2023 Dec; 24(1):294. PubMed ID: 38129864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A sequence-based, deep learning model accurately predicts RNA splicing branchpoints.
Paggi JM; Bejerano G
RNA; 2018 Dec; 24(12):1647-1658. PubMed ID: 30224349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining genetic constraint with predictions of alternative splicing to prioritize deleterious splicing in rare disease studies.
Cormier MJ; Pedersen BS; Bayrak-Toydemir P; Quinlan AR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):482. PubMed ID: 36376793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting the impact of single nucleotide variants on splicing via sequence-based deep neural networks and genomic features.
Naito T
Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 31090248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of computational methods for splice-disrupting variants and improving the performance using the machine learning-based framework.
Liu H; Dai J; Li K; Sun Y; Wei H; Wang H; Zhao C; Wang DW
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35976049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays.
Smith C; Kitzman JO
bioRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37205456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CADD v1.7: using protein language models, regulatory CNNs and other nucleotide-level scores to improve genome-wide variant predictions.
Schubach M; Maass T; Nazaretyan L; Röner S; Kircher M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2024 Jan; 52(D1):D1143-D1154. PubMed ID: 38183205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays.
Riepe TV; Khan M; Roosing S; Cremers FPM; 't Hoen PAC
Hum Mutat; 2021 Jul; 42(7):799-810. PubMed ID: 33942434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the effect of variants on splicing using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Thanapattheerakul T; Engchuan W; Chan JH
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9470. PubMed ID: 32704450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SPiP: Splicing Prediction Pipeline, a machine learning tool for massive detection of exonic and intronic variant effects on mRNA splicing.
Leman R; Parfait B; Vidaud D; Girodon E; Pacot L; Le Gac G; Ka C; Ferec C; Fichou Y; Quesnelle C; Aucouturier C; Muller E; Vaur D; Castera L; Boulouard F; Ricou A; Tubeuf H; Soukarieh O; Gaildrat P; Riant F; Guillaud-Bataille M; Caputo SM; Caux-Moncoutier V; Boutry-Kryza N; Bonnet-Dorion F; Schultz I; Rossing M; Quenez O; Goldenberg L; Harter V; Parsons MT; Spurdle AB; Frébourg T; Martins A; Houdayer C; Krieger S
Hum Mutat; 2022 Dec; 43(12):2308-2323. PubMed ID: 36273432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting Splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning.
Jaganathan K; Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou S; McRae JF; Darbandi SF; Knowles D; Li YI; Kosmicki JA; Arbelaez J; Cui W; Schwartz GB; Chow ED; Kanterakis E; Gao H; Kia A; Batzoglou S; Sanders SJ; Farh KK
Cell; 2019 Jan; 176(3):535-548.e24. PubMed ID: 30661751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. RNA splicing. The human splicing code reveals new insights into the genetic determinants of disease.
Xiong HY; Alipanahi B; Lee LJ; Bretschneider H; Merico D; Yuen RK; Hua Y; Gueroussov S; Najafabadi HS; Hughes TR; Morris Q; Barash Y; Krainer AR; Jojic N; Scherer SW; Blencowe BJ; Frey BJ
Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6218):1254806. PubMed ID: 25525159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discerning novel splice junctions derived from RNA-seq alignment: a deep learning approach.
Zhang Y; Liu X; MacLeod J; Liu J
BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):971. PubMed ID: 30591034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exonization of transposed elements: A challenge and opportunity for evolution.
Schmitz J; Brosius J
Biochimie; 2011 Nov; 93(11):1928-34. PubMed ID: 21787833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A deep intronic TCTN2 variant activating a cryptic exon predicted by SpliceRover in a patient with Joubert syndrome.
Hiraide T; Shimizu K; Okumura Y; Miyamoto S; Nakashima M; Ogata T; Saitsu H
J Hum Genet; 2023 Jul; 68(7):499-505. PubMed ID: 36894704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introme accurately predicts the impact of coding and noncoding variants on gene splicing, with clinical applications.
Sullivan PJ; Gayevskiy V; Davis RL; Wong M; Mayoh C; Mallawaarachchi A; Hort Y; McCabe MJ; Beecroft S; Jackson MR; Arts P; Dubowsky A; Laing N; Dinger ME; Scott HS; Oates E; Pinese M; Cowley MJ
Genome Biol; 2023 May; 24(1):118. PubMed ID: 37198692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic Computational Identification of Variants That Activate Exonic and Intronic Cryptic Splice Sites.
Lee M; Roos P; Sharma N; Atalar M; Evans TA; Pellicore MJ; Davis E; Lam AN; Stanley SE; Khalil SE; Solomon GM; Walker D; Raraigh KS; Vecchio-Pagan B; Armanios M; Cutting GR
Am J Hum Genet; 2017 May; 100(5):751-765. PubMed ID: 28475858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Characteristics of
Weisschuh N; Mazzola P; Bertrand M; Haack TB; Wissinger B; Kohl S; Stingl K
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 34065499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretable prioritization of splice variants in diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Danis D; Jacobsen JOB; Carmody LC; Gargano MA; McMurry JA; Hegde A; Haendel MA; Valentini G; Smedley D; Robinson PN
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Sep; 108(9):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 34289339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
