These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3362039)

  • 1. An exponential model used for optimal threshold selection on ROC curves.
    England WL
    Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 3362039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create "Proper" ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data.
    Mossman D; Peng H
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):349-65. PubMed ID: 25911601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of optimal operating points.
    Halpern EJ; Albert M; Krieger AM; Metz CE; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Mar; 3(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 8796672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
    Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.
    Subtil F; Rabilloud M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.
    Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
    Pan X; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model selection based on FDR-thresholding optimizing the area under the ROC-curve.
    Graf AC; Bauer P
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article31. PubMed ID: 19572830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
    Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
    Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The application of medical decision making to the mass screening: the basic principles on ROC analysis].
    Tsji I
    Rinsho Byori; 1990 May; 38(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 2199711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 10845402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of methods for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
    Centor RM; Schwartz JS
    Med Decis Making; 1985; 5(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3841685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.
    Tosteson AN; Begg CB
    Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 3294553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ROC curve regression analysis: the use of ordinal regression models for diagnostic test assessment.
    Tosteson AN; Weinstein MC; Wittenberg J; Begg CB
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):73-8. PubMed ID: 7851336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.
    Edwards DC; Kupinski MA; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2861-70. PubMed ID: 12512721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The area under the ROC curve and its competitors.
    Hilden J
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 1865785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Ma G; Hall WJ
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 8412547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.