These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33620513)

  • 1. [How to interpret the certainty of evidence based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation)].
    Schwingshackl L; Rüschemeyer G; Meerpohl JJ
    Urologe A; 2021 Apr; 60(4):444-454. PubMed ID: 33620513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks.
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Zuk V; Vandvik PO; Alba AC; Mustafa R; Vernooij R; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Munn Z; Roshanov P; Riley R; Schandelmaier S; Kuijpers T; Siemieniuk R; Canelo-Aybar C; Schunemann H; Iorio A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():62-70. PubMed ID: 31982539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.
    Brozek JL; Canelo-Aybar C; Akl EA; Bowen JM; Bucher J; Chiu WA; Cronin M; Djulbegovic B; Falavigna M; Guyatt GH; Gordon AA; Hilton Boon M; Hutubessy RCW; Joore MA; Katikireddi V; LaKind J; Langendam M; Manja V; Magnuson K; Mathioudakis AG; Meerpohl J; Mertz D; Mezencev R; Morgan R; Morgano GP; Mustafa R; O'Flaherty M; Patlewicz G; Riva JJ; Posso M; Rooney A; Schlosser PM; Schwartz L; Shemilt I; Tarride JE; Thayer KA; Tsaioun K; Vale L; Wambaugh J; Wignall J; Williams A; Xie F; Zhang Y; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():138-150. PubMed ID: 32980429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Certainty ranges facilitated explicit and transparent judgments regarding evidence credibility.
    Tikkinen KAO; Craigie S; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():46-51. PubMed ID: 30145323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The GRADE approach, Part 1: how to assess the certainty of the evidence.
    Kirmayr M; Quilodrán C; Valente B; Loezar C; Garegnani L; Franco JVA
    Medwave; 2021 Mar; 21(2):e8109. PubMed ID: 33830974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Mustafa RA; Siemieniuk RAC; Murad MH; Agoritsas T; Izcovich A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():77-85. PubMed ID: 30529648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences: Risk of bias and indirectness].
    Kaiser L; Hübscher M; Rissling O; Schulz S; Langer G; Meerpohl J; Schwingshackl L
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2021 Feb; 160():78-88. PubMed ID: 33461905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?
    Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():6-15. PubMed ID: 27063205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using systematic reviews in guideline development: the GRADE approach.
    Zhang Y; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30006970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.
    Schünemann HJ; Cuello C; Akl EA; Mustafa RA; Meerpohl JJ; Thayer K; Morgan RL; Gartlehner G; Kunz R; Katikireddi SV; Sterne J; Higgins JP; Guyatt G;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():105-114. PubMed ID: 29432858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) notes: extremely serious, GRADE's terminology for rating down by three levels.
    Piggott T; Morgan RL; Cuello-Garcia CA; Santesso N; Mustafa RA; Meerpohl JJ; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():116-120. PubMed ID: 31866468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness.
    Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():94-104. PubMed ID: 29452223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency.
    Guyatt G; Zhao Y; Mayer M; Briel M; Mustafa R; Izcovich A; Hultcrantz M; Iorio A; Alba AC; Foroutan F; Sun X; Schunemann H; DeBeer H; Akl EA; Christensen R; Schandelmaier S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():70-83. PubMed ID: 36898507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pediatric dentistry systematic reviews using the GRADE approach: methodological study.
    Alvarenga-Brant R; Notaro SQ; Stefani CM; De Luca Canto G; Pereira AG; Póvoa-Santos L; Souza-Oliveira AC; Campos JR; Martins-Pfeifer CC
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jul; 24(1):787. PubMed ID: 39003480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Murad MH; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Jaeschke R; Lange S; Meerpohl J; Langendam M; Hultcrantz M; Vist GE; Akl EA; Helfand M; Santesso N; Hooft L; Scholten R; Rosen M; Rutjes A; Crowther M; Muti P; Raatz H; Ansari MT; Williams J; Kunz R; Harris J; Rodriguez IA; Kohli M; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():129-141. PubMed ID: 32060007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similar Outcomes of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Training of the GRADE Approach for the Certainty of Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Tokalić R; Poklepović Peričić T; Marušić A
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jun; 25():e43928. PubMed ID: 37279050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the Certainty of the Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Importance, Process, and Use.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt GH
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39218429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Murad MH; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Jaeschke R; Lange S; Meerpohl J; Langendam M; Hultcrantz M; Vist GE; Akl EA; Helfand M; Santesso N; Hooft L; Scholten R; Rosen M; Rutjes A; Crowther M; Muti P; Raatz H; Ansari MT; Williams J; Kunz R; Harris J; Rodriguez IA; Kohli M; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():142-152. PubMed ID: 32058069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Xie F; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():83-93. PubMed ID: 29800687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.