BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33620535)

  • 21. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
    Chill HH; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Cohen A; Dick A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament.
    Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The modified Manchester Fothergill procedure compared with vaginal hysterectomy with low uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: long-term outcome.
    Enklaar RA; Knapen FMFM; Schulten SFM; van Osch LADM; van Leijsen SAL; Gondrie ETCM; Weemhoff M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 35652948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Impact of sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension on the anterior compartment].
    Benedito de Castro E; Palma P; Riccetto C; Herrmann V; Bigozzi MA; Olivares JM
    Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 20223141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Total Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Compared With Supracervical Hysterectomy With Sacrocervicopexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
    Giugale LE; Melnyk AI; Ruppert KM; Napoe GS; Lavelle ES; Bradley MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 138(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 34352830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fixation of uterosacral ligaments to anterior vaginal wall during modified McCall culdoplasty after vaginal hysterectomy.
    Mancarella M; Testa F; Chiadò Piat F; Novara L; Biglia N; Sgro LG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():221-226. PubMed ID: 35114574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study.
    Milani R; Manodoro S; Cola A; Bellante N; Palmieri S; Frigerio M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 31848662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women.
    Rappa C; Saccone G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):601.e1-601.e4. PubMed ID: 27342042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combined reconstructive surgery involving uterosacral colpopexy and anterior vaginal mesh implantation for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Hamuro A; Tachibana D; Wang H; Hayashi M; Yanai S; Kurihara Y; Misugi T; Katayama H; Nakano A; Koyama M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jun; 42(6):707-15. PubMed ID: 26913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Mukwege AA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Rhodes DJ; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA; Trabuco EC
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):803-810. PubMed ID: 28921036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [UTEROSACRAL VERSUS SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOLLOWING VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].
    Nasser-Saman D; Yonis G; Haya N; Lavie O; Abramov Y
    Harefuah; 2022 Jun; 161(6):342-348. PubMed ID: 35734789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Rosen ER; Swenson CW; Fenner DE; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 27858132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
    Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.