194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33620894)
1. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications After Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation at Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Stairs J; Jain M; Chen I; Clancy A
Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Dec; 28(12):834-841. PubMed ID: 36409640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National Assessment of Advancing Age on Perioperative Morbidity and Length of Stay Associated With Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Chaudhry Z; Cohen SA; Tarnay C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):482-485. PubMed ID: 27636219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications After Vaginal Vault Suspension Versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Elevated Body Mass Index: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Stairs J; Minassian V; Clancy A
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun; 28(6):391-396. PubMed ID: 35234179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longitudinal Reoperation Risk After Apical Prolapse Procedures in Women Aged 65 Years and Older.
Berger AA; Bretschneider CE; Gregory WT; Sung V
Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 143(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 38227947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample.
Slopnick EA; Petrikovets A; Sheyn D; Kim SP; Nguyen CT; Hijaz AK
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):603-609. PubMed ID: 30283975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Perioperative Pain and Recovery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Westermann LB; Crisp CC; Mazloomdoost D; Kleeman SD; Pauls RN
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 28067743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Readmission and Prolapse Recurrence After Abdominal and Vaginal Apical Suspensions in Older Women.
Sanses TVD; Hanley JM; Zhang P; Richter HE; Gambert SR; Saigal CS
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 27824746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.
Houlihan S; Kim-Fine S; Birch C; Tang S; Brennand EA
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 30393822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Time of Year on Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Renkosiak K; Bradley M; Dubinskaya A; Shepherd JP
Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Sep; 28(9):561-566. PubMed ID: 35649240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
