216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33621558)
1. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive McKeown's vs open oesophagectomy for cancer: A meta-analysis.
Shanmugasundaram R; Hopkins R; Neeman T; Beenen E; Fergusson J; Gananadha S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):941-949. PubMed ID: 30518481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.
Kanekiyo S; Takeda S; Tsutsui M; Nishiyama M; Kitahara M; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Tomochika S; Tokuhisa Y; Iida M; Sakamoto K; Suzuki N; Yamamoto S; Yoshino S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1945-1953. PubMed ID: 29075967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection and thoracic duct resection for early-stage oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Matsuda S; Kawakubo H; Takeuchi H; Hayashi M; Mayanagi S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Br J Surg; 2020 May; 107(6):705-711. PubMed ID: 32077101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
Weksler B; Sullivan JL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in Finland: A population-based study.
Sihvo E; Helminen O; Gunn J; Sipilä JOT; Rautava P; Kytö V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1099-1104. PubMed ID: 30553631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis.
Na KJ; Kang CH; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):841-848. PubMed ID: 34542834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
