These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33621928)

  • 1. Integrated membrane bioreactors modelling: A review on new comprehensive modelling framework.
    Mannina G; Alliet M; Brepols C; Comas J; Harmand J; Heran M; Kalboussi N; Makinia J; Robles Á; Rebouças TF; Ni BJ; Rodriguez-Roda I; Victoria Ruano M; Bertanza G; Smets I
    Bioresour Technol; 2021 Jun; 329():124828. PubMed ID: 33621928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimizing membrane bioreactor environmental footprint by multiple objective optimization.
    Mannina G; Ni BJ; Ferreira Rebouças T; Cosenza A; Olsson G
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Apr; 302():122824. PubMed ID: 32000132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A plant-wide modelling comparison between membrane bioreactors and conventional activated sludge.
    Mannina G; Cosenza A; Rebouças TF
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Feb; 297():122401. PubMed ID: 31761624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from a wastewater treatment plant using membrane bioreactor technology.
    Chen YC
    Water Environ Res; 2019 Feb; 91(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 30735301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities.
    Fenu A; Guglielmi G; Jimenez J; Spèrandio M; Saroj D; Lesjean B; Brepols C; Thoeye C; Nopens I
    Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4272-94. PubMed ID: 20619870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological processes modelling for MBR systems: A review of the state-of-the-art focusing on SMP and EPS.
    Mannina G; Ni BJ; Makinia J; Harmand J; Alliet M; Brepols C; Ruano MV; Robles A; Heran M; Gulhan H; Rodriguez-Roda I; Comas J
    Water Res; 2023 Aug; 242():120275. PubMed ID: 37413746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aeration control in membrane bioreactor for sustainable environmental footprint.
    Mannina G; Cosenza A; Rebouças TF
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Apr; 301():122734. PubMed ID: 31954967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BSM-MBR: a benchmark simulation model to compare control and operational strategies for membrane bioreactors.
    Maere T; Verrecht B; Moerenhout S; Judd S; Nopens I
    Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2181-90. PubMed ID: 21329957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical simulation of scaling-up for AEC-MBRs regarding membrane module configurations and cyclic aeration modes.
    Yang M; Liu M; Yu D; Zheng J; Wu Z; Zhao S; Chang J; Wei Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Dec; 245(Pt A):933-943. PubMed ID: 28938512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advanced membrane bioreactors systems: New materials and hybrid process design.
    Qin L; Zhang Y; Xu Z; Zhang G
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Dec; 269():476-488. PubMed ID: 30139558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Position paper - progress towards standards in integrated (aerobic) MBR modelling.
    Brepols C; Comas J; Harmand J; Heran M; Robles Á; Rodriguez-Roda I; Ruano MV; Smets I; Mannina G
    Water Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 81(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 32293583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated fixed-film activated sludge membrane bioreactors versus membrane bioreactors for nutrient removal: A comprehensive comparison.
    Mannina G; Ekama GA; Capodici M; Cosenza A; Di Trapani D; Ødegaard H
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 226():347-357. PubMed ID: 30130704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation.
    Brannock M; Wang Y; Leslie G
    Water Res; 2010 May; 44(10):3181-91. PubMed ID: 20347471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fouling in membrane bioreactors: An updated review.
    Meng F; Zhang S; Oh Y; Zhou Z; Shin HS; Chae SR
    Water Res; 2017 May; 114():151-180. PubMed ID: 28237783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sustainability evaluation and implication of a large scale membrane bioreactor plant.
    Chen Z; Wang D; Sun M; Hao Ngo H; Guo W; Wu G; Jia W; Shi L; Wu Q; Guo F; Hu HY
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Dec; 269():246-254. PubMed ID: 30189377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling the biological performance of a side-stream membrane bioreactor using ASM1.
    Tian KJ; Liu XA; Jiang T; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
    J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(6):1020-3. PubMed ID: 15900742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling bioprocesses and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor (MBR): a review towards finding an integrated model framework.
    Zuthi MF; Ngo HH; Guo WS
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 122():119-29. PubMed ID: 22608936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electroconductive moving bed membrane bioreactor (EcMB-MBR) for single-step decentralized wastewater treatment: Performance, mechanisms, and cost.
    Udomkittayachai N; Xue W; Xiao K; Visvanathan C; Tabucanon AS
    Water Res; 2021 Jan; 188():116547. PubMed ID: 33126002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of membrane bioreactor solids retention time on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for wastewater reuse.
    Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():53-61. PubMed ID: 24316181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing aeration energy consumption in a large-scale membrane bioreactor: Process simulation and engineering application.
    Sun J; Liang P; Yan X; Zuo K; Xiao K; Xia J; Qiu Y; Wu Q; Wu S; Huang X; Qi M; Wen X
    Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():205-213. PubMed ID: 26905799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.