These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33622803)

  • 1. Psychosocial consequences of invitation to colorectal cancer screening: a matched cohort study.
    Malmqvist J; Siersma V; Hestbech MS; Nicolaisdóttir DR; Bang CW; Brodersen J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2021 Sep; 75(9):867-873. PubMed ID: 33622803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.
    Toft EL; Kaae SE; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Jun; 37(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 31079520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short and long-term psychosocial consequences of participating in a colorectal cancer screening programme: a matched longitudinal study.
    Malmqvist J; Siersma VD; Hestbech MS; Bang CW; Nicolaisdóttir DR; Brodersen J
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2022 Apr; 27(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 34083210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study.
    Juul JS; Andersen B; Laurberg S; Carlsen AH; Olesen F; Vedsted P
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):281-290. PubMed ID: 29929415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using physician-linked mailed invitations in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: effectiveness and factors associated with response.
    Tinmouth J; Baxter NN; Paszat LF; Rabeneck L; Sutradhar R; Yun L
    BMJ Open; 2014 Mar; 4(3):e004494. PubMed ID: 24622950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
    Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential effects of colorectal cancer screening across sociodemographic groups in Denmark: a register-based study.
    Pallesen AVJ; Herrstedt J; Westendorp RGJ; Mortensen LH; Kristiansen M
    Acta Oncol; 2021 Mar; 60(3):323-332. PubMed ID: 33427545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders.
    Tinmouth J; Patel J; Austin PC; Baxter NN; Brouwers MC; Earle C; Levitt C; Lu Y; Mackinnon M; Paszat L; Rabeneck L
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 136(6):E697-703. PubMed ID: 25195923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychosocial Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Intention: An Experiment on the Invitation Letter.
    Scaglioni G; Chiereghin A; Bazzani C; Mezzetti F; Cavazza N
    Int J Behav Med; 2023 Dec; 30(6):867-877. PubMed ID: 36515798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of gender-specific invitation letters on utilization of colorectal cancer screening.
    Zhan T; Hielscher T; Eckardt M; Giese T; Schäfer C; Riemann JF; Ebert MP; Belle S
    Z Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 57(9):1051-1058. PubMed ID: 31525797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colorectal cancer mortality after randomized implementation of FIT-based screening - a nationwide cohort study.
    Njor SH; Larsen MB; Søborg B; Andersen B
    J Med Screen; 2022 Dec; 29(4):241-248. PubMed ID: 35635233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal Adherence to Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing vs Guaiac-based FOBT in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
    Benito L; Travier N; Binefa G; Vidal C; Espinosa J; Milà N; Garcia M
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2019 May; 12(5):327-334. PubMed ID: 30890542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Participation in Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Health Services Study (PICCOLINO Study).
    Pilonis ND; Bugajski M; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Pisera M; Pawlak E; Regula J; Kaminski MF
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Mar; 160(4):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 33307024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Detecting Earlier-Stage Disease-A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark.
    Larsen MB; Njor S; Ingeholm P; Andersen B
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Jul; 155(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 29626451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of a brief phone intervention to increase participation in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme: a randomized controlled trial.
    Selva A; Torà N; Pascual E; Espinàs JA; Baré M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Oct; 21(10):1120-1129. PubMed ID: 31099455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Attendance to an Organized Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Program on the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: An Observational Cohort Study.
    Baldacchini F; Bucchi L; Giuliani O; Mancini S; Ravaioli A; Vattiato R; Zamagni F; Giorgi Rossi P; Mangone L; Campari C; Sassatelli R; Trande P; Esposito P; Rossi F; Carrozzi G; Triossi O; Fabbri C; Strocchi E; Giovanardi M; Canuti D; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Ferretti S; Falcini F;
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 20(10):2373-2382. PubMed ID: 35144023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening programs in Spain.
    Vanaclocha-Espi M; Ibáñez J; Molina-Barceló A; Pérez E; Nolasco A; Font R; Pérez-Riquelme F; de la Vega M; Arana-Arri E; Oceja M; Espinàs JA; Portillo I; Salas D;
    Prev Med; 2017 Dec; 105():190-196. PubMed ID: 28887191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT).
    Breekveldt ECH; Toes-Zoutendijk E; de Jonge L; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; van Kemenade FJ; van Vuuren AJ; Ramakers CRB; Nagtegaal ID; van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):45. PubMed ID: 36814185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort study.
    Rasmussen JF; Siersma V; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e034682. PubMed ID: 32503869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake.
    Tinmouth J; Ritvo P; McGregor SE; Claus D; Pasut G; Myers RE; Guglietti C; Paszat LF; Hilsden RJ; Rabeneck L
    Can Fam Physician; 2011 Jan; 57(1):e7-15. PubMed ID: 21322288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.