196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33623459)
1. Multi-Night Validation of a Sleep Tracking Ring in Adolescents Compared with a Research Actigraph and Polysomnography.
Chee NIYN; Ghorbani S; Golkashani HA; Leong RLF; Ong JL; Chee MWL
Nat Sci Sleep; 2021; 13():177-190. PubMed ID: 33623459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a Consumer Sleep Wearable Device With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in Adolescents Across Sleep Opportunity Manipulations.
Lee XK; Chee NIYN; Ong JL; Teo TB; van Rijn E; Lo JC; Chee MWL
J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Sep; 15(9):1337-1346. PubMed ID: 31538605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Sleep of the Ring: Comparison of the ŌURA Sleep Tracker Against Polysomnography.
de Zambotti M; Rosas L; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Behav Sleep Med; 2019; 17(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28323455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability of the Oura Ring Generation 3 (Gen3) with Oura sleep staging algorithm 2.0 (OSSA 2.0) when compared to multi-night ambulatory polysomnography: A validation study of 96 participants and 421,045 epochs.
Svensson T; Madhawa K; Nt H; Chung UI; Svensson AK
Sleep Med; 2024 Mar; 115():251-263. PubMed ID: 38382312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Validity of a New Consumer-Targeted Wrist Device in Sleep Measurement: An Overnight Comparison Against Polysomnography in Children and Adolescents.
Pesonen AK; Kuula L
J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Apr; 14(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 29609722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.
de Zambotti M; Goldstone A; Claudatos S; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Chronobiol Int; 2018 Apr; 35(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29235907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of photoplethysmography- and acceleration-based sleep staging in a community sample: comparison with polysomnography and Actiwatch.
Liu PK; Ting N; Chiu HC; Lin YC; Liu YT; Ku BW; Lee PL
J Clin Sleep Med; 2023 Oct; 19(10):1797-1810. PubMed ID: 37338335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography.
Roberts DM; Schade MM; Mathew GM; Gartenberg D; Buxton OM
Sleep; 2020 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 32215550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct comparison of two new actigraphs and polysomnography in children and adolescents.
Meltzer LJ; Walsh CM; Traylor J; Westin AM
Sleep; 2012 Jan; 35(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 22215930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of Four Commercial Wearable Sleep-Tracking Devices Tested Under Unrestricted Conditions at Home in Healthy Young Adults.
Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Jameson JT; Markwald RR
Nat Sci Sleep; 2022; 14():493-516. PubMed ID: 35345630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective sleep in pregnant women: a comparison of actigraphy and polysomnography.
Zhu B; Calvo RS; Wu L; Simon L; Shah K; Piano M; Khain U; Izci-Balserak B
Sleep Health; 2018 Oct; 4(5):390-396. PubMed ID: 30241652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of a multisensor smart ring to evaluate sleep: in-lab and home-based evaluation of generalized and personalized algorithms.
Grandner MA; Bromberg Z; Hadley A; Morrell Z; Graf A; Hutchison S; Freckleton D
Sleep; 2023 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 35767600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices.
Ong JL; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Willoughby AR; Chee MWL
Sleep Health; 2024 Feb; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 38087674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of Fitbit Charge 4 for assessing sleep in Chinese patients with chronic insomnia: A comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy.
Dong X; Yang S; Guo Y; Lv P; Wang M; Li Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275287. PubMed ID: 36256631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls.
Menghini L; Yuksel D; Goldstone A; Baker FC; de Zambotti M
Chronobiol Int; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1010-1022. PubMed ID: 33792456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of Fitbit Charge 2 Sleep and Heart Rate Estimates Against Polysomnographic Measures in Shift Workers: Naturalistic Study.
Stucky B; Clark I; Azza Y; Karlen W; Achermann P; Kleim B; Landolt HP
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e26476. PubMed ID: 34609317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating Accuracy in Five Commercial Sleep-Tracking Devices Compared to Research-Grade Actigraphy and Polysomnography.
Kainec KA; Caccavaro J; Barnes M; Hoff C; Berlin A; Spencer RMC
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38276327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relation between ambulatory actigraphy and laboratory polysomnography in insomnia practice and research.
Withrow D; Roth T; Koshorek G; Roehrs T
J Sleep Res; 2019 Aug; 28(4):e12854. PubMed ID: 30941838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of multichannel and single-channel wrist-based devices with polysomnography to measure sleep in children and adolescents.
Burkart S; Beets MW; Armstrong B; Hunt ET; Dugger R; von Klinggraeff L; Jones A; Brown DE; Weaver RG
J Clin Sleep Med; 2021 Apr; 17(4):645-652. PubMed ID: 33174529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three Contactless Sleep Technologies Compared With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in a Heterogeneous Group of Older Men and Women in a Model of Mild Sleep Disturbance: Sleep Laboratory Study.
G Ravindran KK; Della Monica C; Atzori G; Lambert D; Hassanin H; Revell V; Dijk DJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Oct; 11():e46338. PubMed ID: 37878360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
