These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33624316)
1. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition. Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs. Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples. Liu JY J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods. Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery. Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods. Kirgiz IA; Calloway C J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids. Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates. Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Touch DNA recovery from vehicle surfaces using different swabs. Giovanelli A; Grazinoli Garrido R; Rocha A; Hessab T J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34725823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis. Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters. Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct PCR amplification of DNA from human bloodstains, saliva, and touch samples collected with microFLOQ Ambers A; Wiley R; Novroski N; Budowle B Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():80-87. PubMed ID: 29126000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis. Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of "touch" DNA recovery and room-temperature storage from assault rifle magazines. Tasker E; Roman MG; Akosile M; Mayes C; Hughes S; LaRue B Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Mar; 43():101658. PubMed ID: 31954956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visualising latent DNA on swabs. Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of different laboratory storage conditions for enhanced DNA analysis of crime scene soil-blood mixed sample. Badu-Boateng A; Twumasi P; Salifu SP; Afrifah KA Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():97-109. PubMed ID: 30292937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In-field collection and preservation of decomposing human tissues to facilitate rapid purification and STR typing. Holmes AS; Roman MG; Hughes-Stamm S Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():124-129. PubMed ID: 29990824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA quality and quantity from up to 16 years old post-mortem blood stored on FTA cards. Rahikainen AL; Palo JU; de Leeuw W; Budowle B; Sajantila A Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():148-53. PubMed ID: 26937857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A holistic approach for the selection of forensic DNA swabs. Comment D; Gouy A; Zingg C; Zieger M Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111737. PubMed ID: 37247525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A foldable cardboard box for drying and storage of by cotton swab collected biological samples]. Hochmeister M; Rudin O; Meier R; Peccioli M; Borer U; Eisenberg A; Nagy R; Dirnhofer R Arch Kriminol; 1997; 200(3-4):113-20. PubMed ID: 9446522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]