128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33625180)
1. Comparison of ordered-subset expectation maximization and filtered back projection reconstruction based on quantitative outcome from dynamic [18F]NaF PET images.
Wong JM; Puri T; Siddique MM; Frost ML; Moore AEB; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jun; 42(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 33625180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging.
Katua AM; Ankrah AO; Vorster M; van Gelder A; Sathekge MM
World J Nucl Med; 2011 Jan; 10(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22034576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of image reconstruction algorithm on neurotransmission PET studies in humans: comparison between filtered backprojection and ordered subsets expectation maximization.
Morimoto T; Ito H; Takano A; Ikoma Y; Seki C; Okauchi T; Tanimoto K; Ando A; Shiraishi T; Yamaya T; Suhara T
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16715957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Parameters for Image Reconstruction in Tc-99m Methoxyisobutylisonitrile Myocardial Perfusion SPECT and Comparison with Corresponding Filtered Back Projection-Reconstructed Images.
Dheer P; Gupta P; Taywade SK; Passah A; Pandey AK; Patel C
Indian J Nucl Med; 2021; 36(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 34040290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Pixel values of [15O]H2O2 PET images with OSEM algorithm depending on numbers of subset and iteration times: comparative assessment to FBP].
Yamanoi R; Okamoto K; Kawamura K; Ohkubo M; Suzuki Y; Nakamura Y
Kaku Igaku; 2014 Nov; 51(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 25942795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (ordered-subset expectation maximization) in dynamic positron emission tomography: quantitative effects on kinetic modeling with N-13 ammonia in healthy subjects.
Hove JD; Rasmussen R; Freiberg J; Holm S; Kelbaek H; Kofoed KE
J Nucl Cardiol; 2008; 15(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 18674721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of reconstruction algorithms on myocardial blood flow measurement with 13N-ammonia PET.
Chen GP; Branch KR; Alessio AM; Pham P; Tabibiazar R; Kinahan P; Caldwell JH
J Nucl Med; 2007 Aug; 48(8):1259-65. PubMed ID: 17631543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
Cheng JC; Shoghi K; Laforest R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of
Shi X; Li N; Ding H; Dang Y; Hu G; Liu S; Cui J; Zhang Y; Li F; Zhang H; Huo L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():9193403. PubMed ID: 29681784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment.
Riddell C; Carson RE; Carrasquillo JA; Libutti SK; Danforth DN; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 11535719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) versus filtered back-projection for the assessment of myocardial glucose uptake and myocardial perfusion using dynamic PET.
Søndergaard HM; Madsen MM; Boisen K; Bøttcher M; Schmitz O; Nielsen TT; Bøtker HE; Hansen SB
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 17033850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of scatter correction on D2 receptor occupancy measurements using 123I-IBZM SPECT: comparison to 11C-Raclopride PET.
Bullich S; Cot A; Gallego J; Gunn RN; Suárez M; Pavía J; Ros D; Laruelle M; Catafau AM
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 50(4):1511-8. PubMed ID: 20083205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appropriate parameters of the ordered-subset expectation maximization algorithm on measurement of myocardial blood flow and oxygen consumption with 11C-acetate PET.
Kobayashi M; Mori T; Kiyono Y; Tsujikawa T; Maruyama R; Higaki Y; Shikano N; Nishii R; Kawai K; Kudo T; Okazawa H
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Feb; 33(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22124363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for preclinical PET imaging.
Vrachliotis A; Kastis GA; Protonotarios NE; Fokas AS; Nekolla SG; Anagnostopoulos CD; Costaridou L; Gaitanis A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Apr; 217():106668. PubMed ID: 35176596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of resolution recovery by using collimator detector response during 3D OSEM image reconstruction on (99m)Tc-ECD brain SPET images.
Kalantari F; Rajabi H; Ay MR; Razavi-Ratki SK; Fard-Esfahani A; Beiki D; Eftekhari M; Fallahi B; Sadeghian L; Emami-Ardekani A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2012; 15(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 22741145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preliminary evaluation of image reconstruction by ordered-subset expectation maximization in thallium-201 lung scintigraphy.
Bai J; Yokoyama K; Kinuya S; Nakajima K; Yamada M; Ichiyanagi K; Michigishi T; Tonami N
Ann Nucl Med; 2003 Oct; 17(7):619-24. PubMed ID: 14651366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of a deep learning enhancement method applied to PET images acquired with a reduced acquisition time.
Ciborowski K; Gramek-Jedwabna A; Gołąb M; Miechowicz I; Szczurek J; Ruchała M; Czepczyński R
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2023; 26(0):116-122. PubMed ID: 37786943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
