117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33625196)
1. Comparison of Speech Recognition With an Organ of Corti Versus Spiral Ganglion Frequency-to-Place Function in Place-Based Mapping of Cochlear Implant and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.
Dillon MT; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; O'Connell BP
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jun; 42(5):721-725. PubMed ID: 33625196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the Frequency-to-Place Function on Recognition with Place-Based Cochlear Implant Maps.
Dillon MT; Helpard L; Brown KD; Selleck AM; Richter ME; Rooth MA; Thompson NJ; Dedmon MM; Ladak HM; Agrawal S
Laryngoscope; 2023 Dec; 133(12):3540-3547. PubMed ID: 37078508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Dillon MT; O'Connell BP; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Hopfinger J
Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):322-337. PubMed ID: 35394798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Johnson AD; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(6):478-487. PubMed ID: 37482054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear implant spectral bandwidth for optimizing electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
Gifford RH; Sunderhaus LW; Dawant BM; Labadie RF; Noble JH
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108584. PubMed ID: 35985964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.
Dillon MT; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Hopfinger J; O'Connell BP
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 33885267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Electric Frequency-to-Place Mismatches on the Early Speech Recognition Outcomes for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users.
Dillon MT; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Rooth MA; Richter ME; Overton AB; Roth NE; Dillon SM; Raymond JH; Young A; Pearson AC; Davis AG; Dedmon MM; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
Am J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 32(1):251-260. PubMed ID: 36800505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.
Stakhovskaya O; Sridhar D; Bonham BH; Leake PA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):220-33. PubMed ID: 17318276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A frequency-position function for the human cochlear spiral ganglion.
Sridhar D; Stakhovskaya O; Leake PA
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17063006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Jiam NT; Gilbert M; Cooke D; Jiradejvong P; Barrett K; Caldwell M; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Feb; 145(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30477013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Test Condition on Speech Perception With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC
Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 26650652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrocochleography-Based Tonotopic Map: II. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Speech-Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Walia A; Shew MA; Varghese J; Lefler SM; Bhat A; Ortmann AJ; Herzog JA; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38880958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
Baskent D; Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.
Zeng FG; Tang Q; Lu T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88662. PubMed ID: 24551131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
