176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33625843)
21. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
Huynh T; Quick H; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 26209598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimation and inference on correlations between biomarkers with repeated measures and left-censoring due to minimum detection levels.
Xie X; Xue X; Gange SJ; Strickler HD; Kim MY;
Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(21):2275-89. PubMed ID: 22714546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measuring association among censored antibody titer data.
Tran TMP; Abrams S; Aerts M; Maertens K; Hens N
Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(16):3740-3761. PubMed ID: 33942345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Estimation of colorectal adenoma recurrence with dependent censoring.
Hsu CH; Long Q; Alberts DS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Sep; 9():66. PubMed ID: 19788750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of Statistical Treatments of Left-Censored Environmental Data Using Coincident Uncensored Data Sets. II. Group Comparisons.
Antweiler RC
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13439-46. PubMed ID: 26490190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessing the agreement of biomarker data in the presence of left-censoring.
Domthong U; Parikh CR; Kimmel PL; Chinchilli VM;
BMC Nephrol; 2014 Sep; 15():144. PubMed ID: 25186769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Statistical approaches to estimating mean water quality concentrations with detection limits.
Shumway RH; Azari RS; Kayhanian M
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(15):3345-53. PubMed ID: 12188364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of censored exposure data by constrained maximization of the Shapiro-Wilk W statistic.
Flynn MR
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 19955326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evidence of Absence: Bayesian Way to Reveal True Zeros Among Occupational Exposures.
Lavoue J; Burstyn I
Ann Work Expo Health; 2021 Jan; 65(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 32914163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of censoring data below an arbitrary quantification limit on structural model misspecification.
Byon W; Fletcher CV; Brundage RC
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2008 Feb; 35(1):101-16. PubMed ID: 17963024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Slope estimation for informatively right censored longitudinal data modelling the number of observations using geometric and Poisson distributions: application to renal transplant cohort.
Jaffa MA; Lipsitz S; Woolson RF
Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):819-35. PubMed ID: 22143404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of methods for handling censored records in beef fertility data: simulation study.
Donoghue KA; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 14974530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Bayesian Approach for Summarizing and Modeling Time-Series Exposure Data with Left Censoring.
Houseman EA; Virji MA
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Aug; 61(7):773-783. PubMed ID: 28810680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bivariate Left-Censored Bayesian Model for Predicting Exposure: Preliminary Analysis of Worker Exposure during the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.
Groth C; Banerjee S; Ramachandran G; Stenzel MR; Sandler DP; Blair A; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Stewart PA
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Jan; 61(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 28395309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adjusting win statistics for dependent censoring.
Dong G; Huang B; Wang D; Verbeeck J; Wang J; Hoaglin DC
Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):440-450. PubMed ID: 33247544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An Accurate Substitution Method To Minimize Left Censoring Bias in Serum Steroid Measurements.
Handelsman DJ; Ly LP
Endocrinology; 2019 Oct; 160(10):2395-2400. PubMed ID: 31199478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
